PART I
[ABOUT THE BLASPHEMOUS BOOK OF "CARDINAL" VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ
Video recorded on Monday, January 8, 2024, for now I will publish parts I and II, which are half of the 1 hour video, DO NOT MISS PART III, which I will try to translate soon. His way of speaking is peculiar, but it is an excellent catechesis.
INTRODUCTION:]
Welcome, this is KNOW, LOVE AND LIVE YOUR FAITH, this is the program where we share the Gospel and deepen the beauty and richness of our Catholic faith, this is your friend and brother Luis Roman [he is a layman] and I would like to remind you that we cannot love what we do not know and that we only live what we love.
And today it is my turn to speak about a news that is embarrassing, it should be embarrassing for all of us because when a member of the Church is rotten, we all suffer from this rottenness and especially this rottenness, these bad fruits come from the hierarchy, from the high hierarchy of the Catholic Church. It hurts, it bothers, it is a mixture of feelings... to know of things that this man... I cannot evaluate his mental state, but I can speak of what he has written, I can realize that he is not inspired by the Holy Spirit, and that a person like that is in a position as he is in is painful. That Pope Francis has chosen him for that position, knowing him very well for years... I have no doubt that Pope Francis knew about this book.
--
That this man is in this place is because the Lord has allowed it, it is not what He wants but He has allowed it and we obviously have to resist. We have to resist whatever comes from this man. Today I am going to talk about this book that was hidden for many, many years. The book was not even mentioned when the bishop was named cardinal and then appointed Prefect for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, one of the most important offices of the Catholic Church, the one that is supposed to defend our faith... Well, it is in the hands of this man, who I already mentioned, who wrote a book, many years ago, in 1998 called "The Mystical Passion, Spirituality and Sensuality", that is the title of the book, so imagine where we are going and the book was hidden, it was kept secret, it was no longer public, now we are going to talk because now some copies have been found and they have been published and this is what is important, but many will say "hey, José Luis, this is decades ago, why bring this now? "Because we have right now, the Church is on fire, as the planet is on fire right now, and [the Church] is on fire and it's on fire with division and confusion. Not by the bishops who defend the sound doctrine and want to continue preaching what was always preached, but by these modernists like this Cardinal Fernandez, who are pushing an agenda, some ideas, that things like these would have been impossible, to see a priest blessing same sex couples, or to see a priest blessing couples in remarriage, or to see a priest even now (because couples in an irregular state can be blessed) a man can be blessed with his lover... none of that is impossible now. That we are in this situation... we have to see where it comes from, and yes, the devil... and yes modernism... but who is currently moving this agenda? And what kind of mentality do they have, where do the ideas they have come from? how do they reason? How do they see the human being, the human anthropology, how do they see it? what is for them, for these people, the end of the human being? how is that relationship that the human being should have with God? to what extent can we be in communion with God and with... and how does God want to participate in our life? what is sin? what is Heaven? what is hell? If it exists for these people, because these people don't even believe in hell... Sexuality, all this we have to see how they think and there we have to see how they think and that is where the book has a lot of relevance now, it has a lot of importance because there are still many people in the world who are taking this cardinal seriously. And I tell you something, it is serious what is happening now in the Church, but I tell you that this man cannot be followed, not a single tick, not a single word, not a single paragraph, not a single sentence that comes out of that office right now. He will be sitting in the chair that has authority, not authority to change the doctrine but to defend it. If he from the chair that is designed to defend the doctrine, what he does is try to attack it from that chair, that means he is abusing his power, and whatever he does is not legitimate. He is coming out of where he should be and therefore, you and I as Catholics should not follow him. Today Cardinal Sarah came out, God bless him, Cardinal Sarah has been quite quiet [I for one tell you not to trust Cardinal Sarah because he was very close to Benedict XVI, and we know that Benedict XVI was a satanist, just look at his coat of arms: the crowned black man with painted lips and earrings is the devil... and the bear sticking his tongue out (offensive attitude) at the Eucharist. I had read people about the Shroud and the first thing he did upon ascending the Chair of St. Peter was to erase the evidence of 2000 years of pollen, he took it off to remove "detritus" and on top of that he split the papacy in two, which he shouldn't do.... Did Sarah object? No.]
--
Then I'm going to talk about the book. Cardinal Sarah said today, and he said it very clearly, that the document Fiducia Supplicans is heretical. That's what Cardinal Sarah said, it is heretical, I know that other bishops... Bishop Munilla has said: "it is not heretical, it is chaotic"... everyone has his opinion, but the book is not good. The document is definitely not good. Our Lord Jesus Christ said [He says, because His Word is Eternal] that in order to know them, let us look at their fruits. Do not listen to what Luis Roman [himself] is saying or what other brothers are saying in other channels, God bless those who have covered this news today. No, it is not about our opinions, nor that we are paranoid. It is about doing what Christ told us to do. And one of the keys that the Lord gives us, because I cannot see anybody's intentions, nor am I a fortune teller, nor can I see anybody's heart, but I can see the fruits and I can make a judgment, not on the person but on the fruits, and realize that if the fruit is bad, then the tree from which that fruit comes is bad. That is what Christ said, it is as simple as that. If the fruits are division, confusion, alteration, disorder, which had never been seen before, and now they want to tell us about a new type of blessing that in 2000 years the Holy Spirit had not shown us, but just now in a society that accepts this type of life, that does not have God, now the "Holy Spirit" says: [with irony] well now that God is not there, we are going to accept some things within the Church to share with the people who do not believe that God is there. No. That is not the Holy Spirit, that is the spirit of the devil, of the demon speaking through people who have cassocks and great positions in the Church. Yes, it is also.
--
And this book is going to show us what the mind of these people is all about, a perverse mind, it is a pornographic, erotic book. This servant had to read a lot to be able to prepare for the program today and it is pure trash, pure trash, but more than trash it is blasphemy against God, a wrong way of seeing the relationship that we can have with God in prayer. What should be a mystical experience, genuine as the saints had, these perverts want to mix it with sexuality. Because that's what they are, that's what they are, perverts.
--
The great sins of society, St. Thomas Aquinas said it, St. Augustine said it, the Word of God tells us in several places in the Bible, the letter of St. Paul especially in the first letter to the Romans, also the book of Jude tells us, tells us very clearly that when we see sins like these, that the mind, the body and the spirit are given to the lowest pleasures. When the mind of the human being is focused on the lowest, its fruits are going to be of the worst and they are going to be of the most blasphemous and they are going to be of the most rebellious and they are going to be of the strongest against what God wants, because the Order of God places those lower tendencies to those lower pleasures on the lowest, as it should be, where they should be.
--
Well, to begin with, I want us to do [pray] a Hail Mary, we are going to pray it in the language of the Catholic Church.
[PART II
ABOUT THE BLASPHEMOUS BOOK OF "CARDINAL" VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ]
In nomine Patris,
et Filii,
et Spiritus Sancti.
Amen.
--
Ave María,
gratia plena,
Dominus tecum,
benedicta tu in muliéribus,
et benedictus fructus ventris tui Iesus.
Sancta Maria, Mater Dei,
ora pro nobis peccatoribus,
nunc et in ora mortis nostrae.
Amen.
--
In nomine Patris,
et Filii,
et Spiritus Sancti.
Amen.
--
The Queen is already here with us, the demon hates Her, so I think we can talk about this disgusting thing.
--
[ABOUT THE BLASPHEMOUS BOOK]
Well, the book is called: The mystical passion, spirituality and sensuality, this book was hidden, it was written in 1998, I already talked about this, I know it takes time but it is very important that we know about this although the book is not even in rotation or in publication. And the first part of the book, which are the first chapters, those first chapters kind of get you into the nonsense, and he talks about several saints, one of the people he mentions is Angela [I cannot write her last name, it sounds like Jadewich] and he relates that the experience is not only spiritual but also physical and corporeal, her mystical joy had all the characteristics of an orgasm. Did you hear that? The joy of this saint or this Christian, mystical person had all the characteristics of an orgasm. Tell me, where, these are the words of the book, tell me where, in the Bible, in the tradition of the Catholic Church... some saint expressed himself about the mystical experience, about prayers, about what we do in our spiritual life, about our mental prayer, about that connection we should have with God, about that communication, about that conversation we should have with Him daily... with the characteristics of an orgasm... That is really low! That is what I told you from the beginning of the program, these people that fall into these mistakes is because they are walking with their baser instincts. That is why they are so important and in order excuse themselves and to be able to live a life according to what they believe, to what they live, then we have to couple God to our pleasures, and since the most important thing, what fills us, what relieves us, as he mentions later on, is that ecstasy, is to reach these moments... well then that means that the saints and everybody when they prayed had those experiences too... this is disgusting. This is disgusting. How is it possible for a person to think this? That that mystical joy had all the characteristics of an orgasm... How is that possible? When what is transcendental spiritual, supernatural, surpasses any joy, joy, that we can feel with our bodies [it is pure and is had when one is in a state of grace, a healthy joy, for example] and to place that as the lowest thing, and to say that it is an orgasm... This is disgusting, that is part of the first paragraphs of the book. There is a part that I am not going to read, because this is horrible, according to him it is the testimony of a young woman, who let him know that she had this experience and according to him, he says that this experience changed her [with irony:] definitely changed her. And if you ask me, reading the book, I don't think it was a young woman, I think it was him. This is this gentleman, talking. And it is a rather grotesque scene, too passionate, extremely sexual towards Our Lord. I am going to leave it there, I am not going to say anything more. I'm not going to read what he says because I don't want to spoil your evening. And I remember reading the paragraph and I stopped and I said to myself, what the hell is this? Because we are talking about a book that when it was published, it was published apparently as a Catholic book, supposedly.
--
And when you start reading this, now I'm going to talk a little bit about the cover, there you can see the cover: Mystical passion, spirituality and sensuality. Victor Manuel Fernandez. I am going to talk about who are the people on the cover also because it also has a subliminal message, this art... let me share a picture of the original book [minute approx. 15:08 of a total of 1 hour 3 min], there you can see it, it was published by Dabar editions in Mexico and well the names of the chapters leave a lot to say, and that is what I am going to talk about in a few minutes, when you go into chapters 7, 8 and 9. These are the ones that I... imagine... I'm at a loss for words to explain this but the names of the chapters... "Chapter 7: male and female orgasm." This is a spirituality book supposedly. Chapter 8 is titled: path to orgasm. Instead of: Way to Heaven, Way to the Father, Way in common union with the Savior... from Mary's hand to the Son... this is an obsession, is that when you go around sunk in these problems, that's what you reflect, that's what you carry.
--
[yes, they have nothing else in their head but the sexual organ, they see everything through sex. I once read a joke in Reader Digest Selections (monthly magazine in many homes in the 80's, 70's...) where a man went to the psychologist and the doctor drew a vertical line and asked the patient what he saw: "a naked woman", then a broken line and he said: a naked woman bending over. The doctor told him he had a disease since he always answered those things and the sick man said, "and what's my fault that you draw all that crap?"
--
Remember that this Victor Fernandez wrote in a tweet about a month ago: "the only sin is clericalism" it is clear that he is in the hands of the devil (when there are sins of the flesh there is a devil, said an exorcist) and the devil leads him to love all sin and hate the Holy Church. And that is what they are leading our children to by recommending pornography to them in school. We must put an end to sexual indoctrination in schools.
--
Homosexuals, etc. who want to get out of that and speak Spanish, look for the team of Bishop Reig Pla, in Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, they are excellent at rescuing people and there are dozens and dozens of testimonies of ex-homosexuals who are now healthy and happy]
--
Chapter 9: "God in the couple's orgasm", just imagine... And so I can go on, those are the names of the chapters. A book that is supposedly about Catholic spirituality. This is a novelty, this is a mockery of God. A mockery of God. And in a few minutes I am going to read you his [Fernandez] reaction because he has already reacted. We are recording this program today live at 9:00 p.m. Miami time. He already reacted, and it is interesting the reaction because he does not retract anything and he accepts that this book is his, so just in case one had a doubt, we know it is his because he just accepted it, he said it today. Interesting is how he excuses himself for what he wrote, there is a lot left to say.
--
--
In this book, apart from going through everything that is man and woman .... I commented to my wife how it is possible for a priest to know so much. He speaks explicitly, I am not going to go into words now. I think I have said enough, he talks about female parts, male parts, he talks about orgies, he talks about many, many things, that is the language used in this chapter. Too strong, as I told you already, it's a book that is erotic. That's what it is. It is an erotic book. And it starts talking about "mystical orgasm" which doesn't make any sense. Nobody, I believe, in the history of the Catholic Church has ever talked about something like this, but he talks about it, he talks about the differences between men and women, how one babbles, the other moans more, I don't know, I'm not going to go there. I'm looking at the paragraphs that caught my attention a little bit and I don't want to read them all. I'm going to share the links [you tube: ESCÁNDALO por «La Pasión Mística», Libro Del Cardenal Fernández OCULTO y Conocido Ahora / Luis Román (youtube.com)], in the description of the program later when we finish, you can like it if you want to read more calmly, don't read it in front of children [don't read it directly, don't get dirty without needing to !!!!] because it's strong and it talks about all that here in this chapter.
--
Then, in this chapter, towards the way to that ecstasy, he talks about several things, one of the things he talks about is... look what he says, I am going to read it to you because this part is not so graphic, but the "theology" he says here, which is not theology, but he lets you know how twisted this mind is... he says: however, we also have to say (these are the words of the book), however we also have to say that if that loving and passionate experience of God is something fulfilling, something that wonderfully harmonizes and serenades our affectivity and our sensuality, then we all have at least the right to desire it. Look at that. Sin is like that. Sin makes you feel good. Even sin makes you feel a lot of love, a lot of affectivity, because when you are with a person you shouldn't be with, or when you are in a forbidden relationship, when you are doing things that are not right, many times you do them, I would say almost every time you do them because they feel good. It fills you up, it feels nice, and he says here that if that's the case, then we all have a right to desire it. And even, by desiring, one sins. Let us not forget the words of Christ, when He said [He says] that just by lusting after your neighbor's wife, you commit adultery [that is the 9th commandment, Jesus does not specify if it is your neighbor's wife but He forbids us from lascivious glances at any woman]. For the modernists and the fools who say that Jesus Christ made everything easier, that God the Father was the angry God and then comes Jesus, "the rebellious Son and He is the hippie Son" and that one is not so angry and that one has more mercy because the other one was killing everybody.... When we listen to the words of God who is Jesus himself, who is God, the Father and the Son are the same, Jesus himself says it, we see the true meaning of what God had already been doing since the Old Testament and we see much more, we see the fulfillment of what should have been the Law in our hearts, which through sin we forgot, it was clouded, the intellect was clouded, our spirit does not dominate the passions and many times, on the contrary, the passions dominate the mind, the passions dominate the mind, the spirit and we have that battle, but when everything was clear, when everything could be seen clearly and one could know what was good and what was bad, one knew and knew what was really good, and one could know and see that one could not desire something that would break that order, which was really the order that gave me the essence and the happiness that I today and always will have for being a child of God, for having been created in the image and likeness of God. On the other hand, sin gives me the right to supposedly desire it. And as Jesus Christ says, because He shows us the true meaning of the Law, which is to be in the image and likeness of God, God does not even desire something that is wrong because God is Perfect. So if Jesus tells us to be perfect as the Father who is in Heaven is perfect, it is not only a matter of not doing but not desiring, even if one does not do it. Even if I don't take my friend's wife, or go and do something that is wrong, if I am already desiring it I am sinning, because it is already a desire and desiring is an action. An action, a slip, it is not that she suddenly passed in front of me and I said how pretty, and she passed quickly, and with all that it can be sinful, but to desire her: I would like her to be mine, I would like her to be mine, I would like to be with him or her.
--
And here what this gentleman is telling us is that if we have these feelings, we should at least have the right to desire it. And he continues, because there is more: "if that passionate experience of God frees our psychology from so many feelings of dissatisfaction, from so many wounds that we have received because of lack of love, then we have the right to long for God to grant us that liberating experience". In other words, I am basically making demands on God. And he continues: "if we know that our wounded and unsatisfied emotionality often leads us to cause harm to others, to not give ourselves joyfully in the service of others, then it is legitimate that we are attracted to that experience of God that would allow us to be more available, more generous, less dependent on ourselves. It is possible that by making the right path, we can all have an experience of God's love, an experience that heals our sick affectivity." And he continues with this, basically getting to have that sick satisfaction because the book what focuses on, and this is the part that I don't understand, where this gentleman gets the idea from and doesn't realize that when the Lord gives us the opportunity to be able to elevate our soul, our being, our heart, that our body is also elevated, he does it to take us to a supernatural experience, outside of what is natural, because right now what is natural and is good, is submerged in sin, for the same sin that Adam and Eve committed. Because everything that God created is good, but right now everything that God created is not in God's order. Jesus Christ bursts, interrupts, in the history of the human being to give man the opportunity to leave this world, when we go through death, which is death that did not exist before, because death is proof, it is proof that we are still in a fallen plane, we have to go through death, but so that when we go through death we do not stay there, which is what would have happened, but we can then recover, obtain or simply have in us the ability to be able to be what we should have always been. That is what Jesus Christ does in us
[We are at minute 26:10 ]
[When one is in mortal sin, the devil pushes him to more sin, e.g. they no longer find pleasure in sex and look for a lover, then to satiate their dirty desires they may try sodomy, which does not make them happy either, then pederasty... it is like the donkey that has the devil leading him with a carrot in front of him and he keeps changing the carrots to more and more rotten, because the donkey belongs to him more and more and it likes the rotten more and more. Now, in order to attack the Church, the devil puts in front of them, all his perverts, that by mixing their dirty perversions with the Church they will find "healing". They always look for health outside the good Way, and they don't find it, obviously. They hate everything that sounds like obedience to God.]
PART III of the catechesis of Luis Román about the book of "Tucho" Fernández
[From part II: This is what Jesus Christ does for us...] And we get it here, but we get it there, we reach it here, the Saints were made here, but their full holiness, the beatific vision and all that they are, is now there. So it works, it's not that I'm going to enjoy everything here. Because if we are going to be talking about the joy and the worldly, banal joy that is offered in this book, we are definitely going to end up in sexuality because those who have had a partner know, those who are married know that yes, of all the worldly things, one of the most beautiful and most pleasurable moments is that, that is why the devil uses it so much and has corrupted it, has corrupted it. That is why Our Lord Jesus Christ instituted the Sacrament of Matrimony so that there may be some controls. Even within marriage there must be some controls. Let us not go crazy. And now we are going to read some expressions made by this cardinal in this book. [min 27:35] But he goes on with this language that I can't read everything in here, he even talks about "solitary" (when one does it alone) he talks about that too, it's a grave sin, it's not right, to do it that way. He talks also in the book about what he has allowed to be blessed [nowadays] and he emphasizes the following: look at what this gentleman says: "but this does not necessarily mean either that this joyful experience of divine love, if I reach it, it will free me from all my psychological weaknesses, it does not mean for example that a homosexual will necessarily cease to be a homosexual. Let us remember that the grace of God (I am reading from the book) can coexist with weaknesses and also with sins" That is nonsense. That is heresy. That is not true. I am going to repeat: "Let us remember that God's grace can coexist with weaknesses and also with sins when there is a very strong conditioning. In those cases the person can do things that objectively are sins but not be guilty or lose the grace of God or the experience of his love". Wow, you heard that, didn't you? I guess I don't have to say much. How the concepts are all twisted and turned around. With a theology like this, of course, you can bless anybody, because God's grace is there however you want, no matter what you do, God's grace is there however you want, this is very Lutheran, very Lutheran, as Luther thought of sin and justification. That no matter how much we sinned, because the cross is so powerful, when we depart from this earth to another, if we have confessed that Jesus Christ is Lord, no matter what we have done, we are saved, because the cross is more powerful than sin, so Luther thought. And this is exactly what he is saying here. And this also sounds to me like Amoris Laetitia that there has been a lot of talk that the author of Amoris Laetitia was him. There have been many rumors. It sounds to me very much that the author is him. That they want to excuse all these different kinds of love relationships with the pretext that the circumstances, the consequences... and that's where we continue. [Remember that the Old Testament says that Wisdom will not dwell in a body that is an instrument of sin and Jesus says that whoever does not take up his cross and follow Him, is not worthy of Him. And to follow Him means to obey Him, not to wander in the ways of sin].
--
There is also a part here that I can't leave out, near the end of the book, where he talks about multiple things about God in the couple and he mentions that God has manifested this in different religions and he talks in part about false ecumenism, because if one religion is the true religion, then the one who speaks in the other religions is not God. Yes. That's right. I know that sounds not very ecumenical but that is the reality. Now: that God can use those errors, those pagans that exist out there to attract those people to him and that hopefully they will come to Catholicism, yes, of course. But from there to say "no, no, follow the Muslim religion, the Buddhists... God is there too, look, let's read from here" Well, then God contradicts himself, because if you start reading the Koran, you start reading what the Jews study too, so much that we were told: "they are our elder brothers", no, they are not. Why? Because they do not accept Christ. They are not. Unfortunately they have lost their way. It all began with them, yes, but the fulfillment of that religion, which has already done what it had to do, is Catholicism. Catholicism, Christianity is not a new religion, it is the fulfillment of Judaism, and to say that God still speaks in the chair of Moses is nonsense. The chair of Moses is no longer valid. The chair of Moses has already passed. Or that: "no, because we have a connection because we are children of Abraham", neither because Jesus Christ Himself, when they told Him that argument, the Pharisees told Him "why do you tell us that when we are all children of Abraham", He looked at them and told them: you are children of satan, because if you were children of Abraham, you would recognize Me. So: the true children of Abraham recognize the Lord. And we have right now [making quotation marks with fingers] "children of Abraham" who do not recognize the Lord. So no, they are not in the true religion and God is not with them. We believe that there is only one God who is Triune: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and that the Son became Man, died on the Cross, gave His life for us. That the Paraclete was sent to the Church to rule here on Earth together with the Pope and all the bishops. If we truly believe all that, then we know, we have to say that the other religions are false. That we treat each other well, that we try to be cordial, of course, what the Church always preached, tolerance. But not to accept that a man can choose to accept between us or that one, or another religion, between Jesus and Buddha, or between Jesus and Allah and "it's okay" was never Catholic, that is in itself: Masonic. Bishop Schneider has denounced this in the new catechism that he is promoting, and he makes some corrections to the catechism of John Paul II and he makes some corrections to the Second Vatican Council on this point because there is a problem here, and it has led us to this: That this gentleman, even if he quoted what he quoted (this is nonsense) but he quotes the different religions and he quotes the Muslims, Allah, where he talks in a way that one says "but what is this", he talks about the organ of man where "well the Lord gave it to man..." and well, I'm not going to say anything else, and there he names this religion, so you can see all these horrors in this book.
--
Now, Cardinal Fernandez .... ... Thanks to the 2,200 who are already connected in the program, we are live, I am going to take questions in a few moments, but, we are going to analyze this and realize the problem that we have right now in the chair of the dicastery for the doctrine of the Faith, the serious problem that we have right now. And he has been put there for a mission. And he is fulfilling it. And what we have to try to do is to resist and defend our Catholic Faith. We have no other choice. But I do want to and I'm going to keep mentioning it, because this is not about an old book, it's about who wrote it And look what he tells us today, because of course, he had to react. All the Catholic media, including the modernist media, covered this news today. Cardinal Victor Manuel "Tucho" Fernandez, Prefect for the Doctrine of the Faith, reacted to the controversial book: the mystical passion, spirituality and sensuality, published as I already said, in 1998, in Mexico and that has reappeared today... he says the following... (well, I want to talk to you a little bit quickly about... I already told you about the names of the chapters of the book, I don't want to mention all those words because that says a lot about the kind of book it is, but I want to talk about the image briefly [cover image, min. 36:04] because the image says a lot, and when an author chooses what he chooses as the cover of his book (which the back cover is worse, I can't show that one... I'm telling you... this is pornography). this is pornography) But the work that you have here in front of you, the work, is called the abduction of Psiquiste [I don't know how to write it and it also says that it is the work of a Frenchman who sounds like William Adolfe Uberió ] which shows the Greek gods Eros and Psisque (Psisque comes from psychic, from the psyche, from the mind) and Eros is from erotic, so we have an idea of where we're going with this. And it's not so [unclear words] that he chose this image for the front of his cover. So Eros and the psyche (the mind) are embraced and naked, covered only with the "moral mantle." Which has other connotations, we could do a whole program on that, but I did want you to know about that part of it.
--
[I think that this rapture of the psyche is what the satanists do: to make tremendous sins within the Church so that God leaves us in the hands of our enemies. With this telepathy (which here in Argentina almost everybody has it) and Artificial Intelligence, I guess they want to pave the way for us to become mental slaves of artificial intelligence. We have to reject everything of the world (especially TV and modernism and humanism, and socialism, which Our Lady tells us are satanism) and live according to the Holy Tradition. Do you understand that Our Lady of the Roses directs us well?]
--
Now, Cardinal Fernandez said today for exclusive statements to infovaticana, he spoke about the book that appeared now again after 35 years and he said that at the time of the publication of "the mystical passion" he was 30 years old, 35, twelve of them as a priest. And he says: long after that book I did other more serious books such as: "the healing force of Mysticism" and "the transforming force of mysticism" he added. And there comes out the part that I do not understand, so this book is not serious... that is, when he says to me "no, I wrote another more serious book"... well, he is trying to tell me that this book is not serious, it seems, which also contradicts itself. He also says that at this time he would not write a book like this again. But he did it at the time because he saw it was opportune. The cardinal explained that he withdrew the book "Mystical Passion, Spirituality and Sensuality" shortly after it came out and never allowed it to be reprinted, the text, he said, made sense at that time, back in 1998, according to him, at a time of dialogue with young couples who wanted to better understand the spiritual meaning of their relationships... I will pause here, I will continue with his reactions. Cardinal: what you write in this book would be the worst advice you could give to a couple today because if the relationship with God depends on the joy that we have in these low pleasures, what are they going to do? What are we going to do, rather, when there is no flame? Because like any couple today, that flame goes out. That's normal, whether it's because of age, old age, time, for whatever reason. What does last, it is supposed to last, is love. Love is supposed to last and that love, who fills that love is not orgasm or joy or anything like that, it is God, it is God who fills that joy, it is Jesus, in married life. It is not easy many times, in married life, as I say, it is true: the one we love the most is the one we have to bear the most. Because that's how it is, that's how life is. And that is the beauty, that is the beauty of marriage. And people... it would be ridiculous to tell couples that through that joy they are going to find God, that He manifests Himself there... that's what the world preaches to us. [It is the consummation of what bad people usually say when they say they had an orgasm: I saw Christ's face... remember that even in vain words we will be judged] and that is why there are so many divorces, because when the joy is over, then what do I do? "I have to be happy" "I have to find someone who loves me, I have to feel loved" "I have to feel loved by her" "I have to feel loved by him" "I have to be happy" what do they say to you? "Yes, you have to be happy", "Doesn't he make you happy? Doesn't she make you happy? Yes, you have to get out of there" and that's why we are where we are. And the statistics say: (these are the Catholics who are not living their faith, obviously) but the statistics of divorced Catholics are on par with the people who are not Catholics and are out there and are divorced. So the numbers are almost on par. That's how serious things are right now within the Church. That's how serious it is. And he says today that "this was for married couples". That is to say, "do not be scandalized, the cardinal says now, this book was for married couples, do not worry" Better if he had not said that?
--
[That saying that marriage is a license to do everything they can think of sexually, except watching pornography, is a TRAP. If you read "Null and Sacrilegious Confessions" written by St. Alphonsus Liguori, you will read a case of a young woman to whom a hideous and disgusting pig appeared in her room and she was about to throw herself out of the window but the pig said: "Don't jump daughter, I am your recently dead mother, I am condemned for certain things I did with your father. Don't pray for me because I feel so sorry."]
---
PART IV
From Mr. Luis Roman's talk on the blasphemous book of Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez. The previous ones are in my blog under "news", subtitle: "blasphemous Víctor M. Fernandez".
--
[Better he had not said that... ] Better he had said: "I was trying to experiment and I wrote an erotic book... that was it and it was a mistake and I took it down". No. At no point here, I'm going to continue with what he said today, at no point is he retracting anything, anything, he's even blaming us. Yes, he is blaming you and me, as he did with Fiducia Supplicans, he is blaming the people who do not understand that document supposedly so clear... "we are not doing anything different..." What? Just the same, that is how these modernists are, they blame the other, the one in front of them, that is how leftists are. But they cannot admit a mistake.
--
Look at the next line: "after having published the book, I withdrew it soon after because I thought it could be misinterpreted". Really, what could be misinterpreted? The book has no other way to be misinterpreted. It's an erotic book. And we don't know the story. But I have no doubt that someone or some confronted him at the time. This is me making conclusions and then he said, "Look, I'm going to take it out". And he withdrew it at that time." I don't think it's a good thing," he says: "I don't think it's a good thing that it's now being circulated. Well, the book is not good... what happened? He continued: "and its recent dissemination is something contrary to my will". In other words, he doesn't want the book to be disseminated any further. Now the interesting thing about this man, who does not deny anything, has already admitted that the book is his and has not retracted anything, on the contrary he blames us for misinterpreting it... is that this is the third time in a little more than 6 months that Cardinal Fernandez distances himself or tries to amend his own writings. And I can tell you something: get used to it. Because just as Pope Francis has to be interpreted and reinterpreted and 20 people have to come out and say: "no, the Pope did not say this". The same will happen now with this gentleman. He is going to say one thing, then he is going to say that he was misunderstood, then he is going to say "no, it is this" and then when he is going to encounter so much resistance he is going to say: "no, I do not want to talk about it" and he is going to distance himself from the document.
--
[Note from Susana: what I think is that they write twisted so that now clarifications are made in the air but that it remains twisted for the future where it will be interpreted in the twisted form. That is because people do not protect themselves with the sacramentals and they are disappearing, changed by clones that look like them but you can see in their movements that they are 15 years younger and they do everything that the one-world planners want. In the Ecclesiasticus it says: like a madman who shoots incediary arrows, so is the one who insults his neighbor and says: "I was only joking". Francis and the Bergoglians are filling the Church with fires].
--
Half a year ago, in July 2023 Cardinal Fernandez defended himself against criticism of his book, another book, in case you didn't know it that is called "Heal me with your mouth, the art of kissing", that book is from 1995 and it is the same thing, very sexual. I tell you: pray for this man, because he is sunk, and it was launched when he had 10 years of priesthood, and he was already a doctor in theology, that is, he was not an ignorant. And he had to distance himself from the criticisms of that book and you know... The current Prefect for the Dicastery of the Doctrine of the Faith assured that it was a catechesis for adolescents. The same thing. I don't want any teenager, my daughters when they grow up, and any teenager who sees me to buy that crap because they will be confused.
--
[I think that people are asleep, they do not realize that these degenerate Masons, homosexuals, Jews (who were the first to enter the Church with malice and then they put their gypsies and Nazis... ) yes, people, they all work in groups... I think they do not understand that these vermin come to DESTROY THE CHURCH, TO DESTROY ITS STRUCTURE AND ITS CATECHESIS SO THAT WE CATHOLICS DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE TRUE RELIGION. It happens in Spain, where even the good priests say: do not take your children to religion class (which is optional). It happens from the Vatican. It happens in our parishes, where for example, in the only one where I went to receive the Sacraments, the last times I went there was a drag queen who officiates as if he were a priest and also teaches everything changed, e.g. "that chastity is not a genital-breast thing"... it turns out that if there is no chastity of the body there is no chastity of the soul.
That saying "God will not be able to change me" is a sin against the Holy Spirit, no, what they do in their jokes are sins against the H. S. but that example is against the Divine omnipotence. And many things against the gospels, which I already forgot. And when the "final blessing" says: may the blessing of God descend as a caress on you, THEY COME TO CHANGE THE WHOLE RELIGION AND THEY HAVE TO BE THROWN OUT NOW, BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALL THE VIRULENCE OF THE DEGENERATES].
--
In a post published on July 3 on his Facebook account, Fernandez said that "years ago they referred to a booklet of mine that talked about kissing, at that time I was very young, I was a parish priest and I was trying to reach young people, then it occurred to me to write a cartequesis for teenagers based on the meaning of kissing". There are so many stories to reach young people in order to understand the Gospel: stories of saints... in the Holy Bible so many verses... [with irony:] "no, we are not going to use something banal which is the kiss", that a kiss is not bad, I am not saying it is bad, but if we are going to talk about the transcendental, if we are going to talk about what takes me to Heaven, to the highest, why am I going to focus on the lowest, which are the pleasures here below. Not necessarily all the pleasures here are bad, I am not saying that they are bad. But that should not be the end, that should not be the focus. It can't be. I'm going to be talking a little bit about the book of the Song of Songs... because some people say, "What about the Song of Songs," what is that, an erotic book also in the Bible? What I just said is not true but it is what some ignorant people say. "If the Song of Songs is in the Bible, what's wrong with Cardinal Fernandez playing a little with that theme?" They are two very different things.
--
That's the second time he distanced himself from his own writings, it was now, and after the uproar raised by his December 18 Fiducia Supplicans statement allowing the blessing of same-sex couples though without officially validating their status or altering in any way (apparently, right?) the Church's perennial teaching on marriage, as I said [with irony:] "they're not bothering with marriage," yet. So they're mixing one issue with the other. They are talking to me about they want to give me chinas, they want to give me oranges, "oranges, look here are the oranges" and at the moment someone asks "are they giving me apples?" " no, apples are still apples". That is what is happening in this document. [what is happening in the Church, that people who want to reason the writings of the Bergoglians do not understand anything because the satanists, their father the devil eats their brains, read the first admonition of St. Francis of Assisi]. They are talking to us about new blessings, they are talking to us about how to bless sin, how to accompany these people without having to tell them that they are wrong. All of that is denying doctrine and not doing charity to people but [ironically:] "we are not changing the perennial teaching of the Church on marriage." Exactly, the Church's teaching on marriage they're not changing it, but that's not the point. They are changing something else and they want to distract me with this.
--
[The teaching that marriage is indissoluble was already changed when they gave nullity to Caroline of Monaco, then there was a tsunami of nullities in the whole Church. Nullities that are NULL, they are still married and when they remarry they are in adultery, no matter how much the bishops have annulled their marriage, all the misfortunes came because people started to watch TV in the family and stopped praying in the family and in the convents].
--
And it sounds nice: "look, we are not changing the teaching on marriage, marriage is still between a man and a woman", "aha" And the blessings? What are they? A novelty. As Cardinal Müller said: blasphemy if a priest does it. And as Cardinal Sarah said today: a heresy.
--
[Since we are going to have to train ourselves to stay in the Church even though the leaders are rotting away, or they are being replaced by clones because they don't protect themselves, until we have the same devil running it, I found a way for them to bless as doctors by saying only: "May God bless you with sincere conversions". Jesus ate with publicans and sinners and it was not to join in their merriment, he went with them as a doctor. A blessing without homosexuals entering the Church, at the door at the end of the Mass... is my humble suggestion]
--
Cardinal [Fernandez] issued a 6-page clarifying note on January 4. Which here I read it already, I am going to talk about it now but it was exactly the same, a document that supposedly was clear but he had to clarify and he did not clarify. [because they are begats of darkness and they don't want clear light on anything or anything firm but their rottenness] confused it and, he did what he did here today, he blamed it on us. The occult book that came out today, The Mystical Passion, Spirituality and Sensuality... [with irony:] "which can be misunderstood, which is not what I wrote..." And with Fiducia Supplicans, what did he tell us?: that we needed more time, that the Africans and all the dioceses that have stood up against this document... he says "that we have to internalize it, that we have to think, that it's going to take time..." but at no point does he say: "look, it's fine, we're not going to do it, we're going to back out." No, not at all, it's exactly the same thing, so let's get ready because we're going to get more of the same.
--
Now, about the book of the Song of Songs, which is a very beautiful book, the main difference between the Song of Songs and eroticism is the difference between its means and its aim. I believe that a survey today.... That I congratulate the vast majority because they answered well... because that's the big difference: it's its means and its aim. When Solomon writes the Song, he describes love and beauty. For that he uses the most fundamental consummation of those virtues. That consummation is human sexuality... but the virtue is not sexuality, or the focus is not sexuality. Love and beauty are the end.
--
[I think we should interpret everything in a spiritual way, e.g. I always remember that part that says "your neck is covered with shields of brave men..." when I see the columns of certain churches full of shields where people thank God or put them for the soul of a loved one. But that's my personal interpretation]
--
Sexuality is the means. That admiration that we see in the writings that speak of the breasts, that speak of that, of the other... is for the love that he feels, for the beauty that he admires. On the other hand, the erotic reverses that order... what we see in the Cardinal's book, the main objective is to describe human sexuality, which we see in chapter 7 and 8 of the book I was talking about just now, he devotes paragraphs, whole paragraphs to describe man and woman. That is eroticism. Describing human sexuality and sometimes he does it by using descriptions of beauty and physical love. But in eroticism, what is erotic, sexuality is the aim. Love and beauty are nothing more than means, even disposable. That is the other way around. And that is exactly what he proposes in this book when he talks about "we have to have an orgasm with God". It's exactly that, the end is sexuality but [with irony:] "let's make it look like it's a prayer" [reminds me of some sacrilegious Madonna video, I didn't see the Church in the 90s reacting] "let's think it's a mystical experience, that it has to be sensual" and what he does is he takes great saints out of context in this book as well. It's horrible. So I wanted to place that difference between this book, what is eroticism and the Song of Songs. Because the Song of Songs is a very, very good book, if we understand it as it should be.
--
Well, I am going to take advantage, I am going to take some questions, if you want to ask questions on the subject, comments, but questions... please put the question mark, I don't have much time left, but I want to answer some of your comments.
--
RH. He says to me, " We should pray that Monsignor Schneider becomes Pope." You know what, I'm doing that, I hope so. He would be an excellent Pope and he wouldn't be the first bishop that would be chosen in the history of the Catholic Church. To be Pope he would have to be made a cardinal at the same time and then they make him Pope. So there we see.
--
V.A. "This cardinal is like obsessed, more than that, he is a sick person and we have to pray for him" And what we should ask right now to the Pope and I know it sounds a little bit... and one says, true, I know it is not going to happen, but we do not lose anything by saying it: This gentleman, Cardinal Fernandez has to resign. He has already demonstrated that he is not fit for this position. He has clearly demonstrated it in these 6 months. With this document of the blessings, with the refusal on the part of the Church. The dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, and this is what we have always seen in history, when it was expressed, it was well received. That is, there was resistance from certain groups but the majority received it well, why? Because it was defending the doctrine of the Church. And the Church is doing its Fidelium which is what is happening now, it recognizes when God is speaking, when it is the Word of God and it recognizes when it is not, and that is what is happening now, that is why there is so much negativity against this document that he published, because it is not following the Gospel, it is not following the Message.
--
F.V. Why the other rites do not accept the authority of the Pope and the Church accepted it. Ok, F. , Thank you for the question. The other rites, let's clarify something, the Church has 22 rites if I'm not mistaken and all 22 are under the Pope. Rites are rites and we have many, many Eastern Catholics who are in communion with Rome. The ones that are not are the Orthodox, which is the great schism that there was. And they should be in the authority of the Church, we should pray for them to unite. They did not accept the blessings, but it is not only them. We have dozens and dozens of archdioceses that have already expressed themselves, from the Roman Church, and we have a huge list of bishops, I think there are already more than hundreds, who have expressed that they are not going to do it and priests as well. And yes, we have a lot of silence in some places. We have to pray for that. But I do want to clarify that part. That's not just the Roman rite. The Catholic Church has 21 rites under the Pope but those are small communities. They are not very big.
--
Here I am asked, "How can we get him to resign"? I say let us pray. There are petitions, there is talk, talk to your bishops. The cardinals are the ones who have to initiate this process officially to orient the Pope and tell him: "hey, you have to get this man out". But you know, this man is almost his brother so that's the way things are now, the cardinals are not doing anything either. So things are difficult, but we have to do what we have to do.
--
J.M. tells us: "don't give up faith in Christ, Tucho is really crazy". And I wish it were madness, the problem is that since it is not madness, the Lord will ask him to account for these actions. So what can we do?
--
C.E. says: "Should we return to tradition? Likewise it is. We must return to Tradition.
--
José says to me: "invite Monsignor Isidro Puente". We are working on it, we are going to invite him. Pray for that, if God wants it to be so, it will be so.
--
J.M. says: "50 shades of Tucho". Alerttttttt. Thanks for the comment, you have to take things sometimes with good humor.
--
RML: Greetings here from Mexico.
--
Maura says to me: "with what face can we tell other brethren to come to the Catholic Church with such a Pope?" Maura, thank you, tremendous question, and yes, it is difficult. But there we can show what true Catholicism is. We don't believe that we have a demigod. The ideal is to have a Holy Pope and to be able to show the Holiness of that Pope, but when we have the situations we have now, this ambiguity, many of the Protestants I know have told me: "hey, that Pope you have is like a liberal". They themselves realize it. But the important thing is that they also realize that we always follow Christ. And yes, we respect the order that the Church has because that order was instituted by Christ himself, we cannot forget that and we do not leave that order because otherwise we fall into rebellion. But there are some things that are clear: I owe blind obedience to God. I obey the hierarchs, for example, we all have a parish priest. If you have a spiritual director, there is a certain obedience to that spiritual director, certain respect. The same goes for the priest, there is a certain obedience, certain respect, that is what I mean. If the priest tells me: "Luis, I like coffee without sugar and from now on you are going to drink it without sugar", that has no basis in the Bible, no, I do not have to listen to that priest. "Now it is different if he suggests to me: "I want you to offer the coffee without sugar, offer the sugar and drink it without sugar" And if I also accept and we are in common agreement, we do it and I accept that penance for a while. But when it comes to such trivial things I don't have completely. If the priest even tells me: (and this is where the important part comes), if the priest tells me to do something against the Word of God, I definitely don't have to do it. That rule is easy to make with priests, it applies with bishops and it applies with the Pope as well. But it's hard for people to see it with the Pope, but it applies with the Pope If the Pope tells me that we must obey the UN, as he said a few years ago, or if he tells me that we must follow the 2030 agenda, which they are already following as well... if I see that he supports the Clintons, the Soros, that we see all the junket that is there, and I do not agree, well no, I do not have to follow him in that, that is the political way of handling it, but what he is doing there has nothing to do with the papal infallibility and I do not have to follow it because it does not bring me closer to God. I must listen to my hierarchs as long as they lead me to God, which is their duty, to lead their sheep to God. some do it well, others don't. And yes, it has been a long time since we had a papal crisis ..... Well I think this is an unprecedented one, but there have been other popes, we always think of the past, and there has never been one as obvious as this in these last centuries. We have this one in this pontificate that there is definitely no doubt. So, in this way one can show the Protestants a little bit: oh look, we follow Christ and the best of all is that Christ instituted a Church that regardless of how bad or good the hierarchs are, regardless of how bad or good we all are, because we are to blame, the laity... The sacraments, all the graces, are still there, present. The word of God does not change. It is always there, present, bearing fruit. Do not forget the crisis of Avignon, we had 3 Popes in the Catholic Church and nobody knew, there was confusion: who is the true Pope. We had Saints, like St. Vincent Ferrer who defended one and we had St. Catherine of Siena defending the other. Both are saints. They are both saints. Because they followed what led them to come closer to God, which is what you and I are called to do. [It is not a matter of each one doing what he feels brings him closer to God, but of approaching Him according to the Holy Tradition. There is no other way.]
--
--
Let's see what else, I'm getting a lot of questions in the comments. [reads:] "Our Lord is being crucified again..." and so it is. Not only Our Lord, the Church, is going through its passion. The catechism of the Catholic Church says it, not only the catechism, the Bible says it, the Magisterium says it, the great Fathers of the Church, of the Patristics have said it: In the last times the Church is going to go through a passion similar to the one Our Lord went through. And Our Lord was spat upon, He was despised, He was deceived, or they tried to deceive Him. And that is what they are doing now with the Church, they want to demolish it, they want to mistreat it, they want to hide it... and Holy Saturday is coming. On Holy Saturday everybody thought that Christ was finished, exactly the same thing that is going to happen with the Catholic Church, a moment will come when many will think that it is not there, and that will be the moment of the great victory. Let there be no doubt about that.
--
Reading more comments: "They say around here that the only one they attack is the Catholic Church, the Protestants have their own problems, there are so many ways to defend the Catholic Church" It is very, very true.
--
Dani T. tells me: can you interview Father Carlos Spahn? I have already interviewed him. There are two interviews with him on my channel. I have two videos because we made a short one on a separate topic, but we also have an interview with him here. Simply by my name: Luis Román - Carlos Spahn, we did an excellent interview with him I think one or two years ago, more or less, so don't miss it.
--
With that I will say goodbye. I am going to leave some links that I ask you to visit so that you can get a little more information and I am also going to leave a petition to see if that cardinal is leaving the chair, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez. And nothing else, with that I say goodbye, the truth is that I love you in the love of Christ and Holy Mary. Ora pro nobis, Holy Mary. Pray for us. May God bless you. Bye Bye.