Part 1
TRANSLATION:
October 28, 2024
Transcript of “The Faith of the Church”.
Pope Francis declares: they must convert to the “Synodal Church.”
--
“We live in a time of unprecedented crisis and doctrinal confusion in the Church” Msgr. Athanasius Schneider
--
I believe that these words of Msgr. Shneider set the stage for what I can see in the final document of the famous synod on synodality. I really see a tremendous confusion, even a very serious loss of what is Catholic identity and it seems, if I have to describe this final document, the synod on synodality as if it were a founding document of a new religion.
--
In fact in the document itself we find over and over again expressions that suggest that the Catholicism of two thousand years ago was somehow dead and the synod on synodality is bringing about a resurrection. But let's get straight to the article. As always I ask you to like, share on your social networks and let's see what we find in the article. You can see on the screen that it says: “End of the blessed synod, three years of pedaling on how to transform the Church from within” There we have the picture of the end of the synod [1: 35] there is also that famous sculpture that many have commented that it is very strange, although they say that it has symbolisms of the resurrection, but the truth is that it is very strange, a bit scary, but it is the background of the photo, there you see a great multitude of bishops, priests and laity and in the central part you see the [anti] pope francisco . I am trying to see where the episcopal chair is, I do not see it, I mean the Pope's chair (...).
--
Let's go straight to the article, October 28, 2024.
--
“The second session of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops” which remember that the uniqueness is that in this synod of bishops it no longer includes only bishops as it has always been but it includes lay people and it also includes non-Catholics both from Protestant traditions and I even understand that they invited people who are not Christians [that's to lay the first stone of the demolition of the hierarchy, if it is “of the bishops” then all that non-Catholic riffraff tends to be called bishops, continue reading and commenting on the article] “ this Sunday which was the conclusion of this synod on synodality at the Vatican with the final closing Mass with the publication of the document advocating a more synodal church oriented towards communion, participation and mission. ” A true conversion towards a synodal Church, to begin with, we are already being told of a conversion. That is, Catholics now have a need to convert to a synodal church, according to the words being quoted here. A true conversion to a synodal church. In other words, Catholics must now convert to a synodal church, it quotes “a true conversion to a synodal church is indispensable to respond to the needs of the times”, meaning that in these 2000 years that we have not been able to go to a synodal church we have not been able to respond to the needs of the times, to the real needs of mankind? He reads in the context.
--
“This approach aims to make the Church a more welcoming place where the voice of all the faithful, including the laity, has a relevant power in decision making. [Unfortunately they want to welcome all mortal sins, they want us to welcome them, but the true Church always fought, fights and will fight against the devil, the world and the flesh, whether they are outside or infiltrated, whoever does not fight against them to the best of his ability goes to hell with them, for the antipope and his chief, the devil, (if they are not stopped by excommunicating the antipope and all the heretics and scandalous ones), will introduce mortal sins little by little until they lead the sheep that obey them to hell itself, because they would have followed the FALSE OBEDIENCE, which is betrayal of Christ. ]
--
What they are proposing here to include the laity in the decision making in the parishes, in the dioceses, in the episcopal conferences is something that they are pushing very hard. This is already being done in the Protestant countries, in the Protestant churches, so to speak, they already practice this type of thing, and this also began in Germany, with the synodal path and now we see that they are bringing it, they want to bring it to the Church through this synodal synod. So we already see more of the Protestantization of the Catholic Church.
--
And I see that in this document what they are doing is going to the kitchen [going headlong] with the Protestantization process that they are carrying out. This approach aims to make the Church a more welcoming place where the voice of all the faithful, including the laity, has a relevant role in decision-making.
--
We continue: “one of the most salient points of the synod was the need to give greater recognition to women within the Church” As if women have not had recognition for 2000 years. [there are many saints,martyrs and some female Doctors within the Church, worldly people do not have as many honored women as the Church] Really if there is one place on Earth where women have been honored and given the value they have as God's creature it is in the Catholic Church, so I don't understand how they are now talking about recognition. This sounds to me more like an entry of feminism that is an attack on the leadership role that God has given to men. But I'll go back and continue with the article. They want to give greater recognition to women within the Church, “allowing them access to positions of responsibility in parishes and other bodies. The document also leaves open the possibility of exploring the access of women to the diaconate”. You remember we saw in the last program how they are leaving open the possibility of a female diaconate. So that's problematic because the Church doesn't see the slightest possibility. The million dollar question is why do they keep talking about the possibility of women's access to the diaconate when the Church does not allow it? As we would say: let's not be silly, this is not possible because the Church simply does not admit this possibility. I believe that this is where what many bishops and cardinals are talking about comes in: to speak of a pastoral diaconate, which does not exist. The pastoral diaconate does not exist. For that to happen, they would have to invent, they would have to pull “out of their sleeves” as we say.
--
We continue: “it leaves open the possibility of exploring the access of women to the diaconate, a demand that has gained strength in various ecclesial sectors [in the infiltrated satanic ones, which are not so many, 90% of the Church rejects them]. This openness seeks to respond to the gifts that the Spirit distributes in abundance among the faithful, according to the final text” of the synod of synodality. The question I ask is how do they speak of the female diaconate as a gift that the Holy Spirit distributes to the faithful, when it is something that has not existed for 2000 years? So there we see another contradiction in this document.
--
thinRemember that the document has been drafted by all the participants of the synod of synodality. The [anti]pope Francis decided this time not to make a post-synodal exhortation, and he wanted instead of the traditional post-synodal exhortation, he wanted to put together this final document in which all the participants contribute, and publish it, instead of the post-synodal exhortation of the pope. So we have a manifesto of the “people” so to speak, people in quotation marks, instead of the traditional exhortation of the [anti]pope. [I suppose it is to lay the foundation stone of satanic democracy in the Church.]
--
Now let us continue. “Item no. 60, approved by a large majority is also the one that had the most votes against (97 in total)” and item 60 reads as follows: ‘This Assembly invites to give full implementation to all the opportunities already provided by the existing law in relation to the existing law’ is the canon law, which by the way is about to change, already right now they are working on a radical reform to the canon law. You could say: why are they making this radical reform of canon law? In order to be able to carry out all the major changes they are proposing in the synod of synodality. If they wanted to do it right now as the code of canon law is, they would have many problems, they would have many impediments. If they wanted to implement the changes and reforms proposed by the synod of synodality, it would be virtually impossible for them. That is why while you and I are here meditating on this, they are already working on a radical reform of the code of canon law. [Francis must be declared antipope urgently and the Church must return to the Holy Tradition !!!!!, as I add what Our Lady of the Roses asks us: “that all scandalous and heretics be excommunicated”, the infiltrated Jews tell me, “sure, and then she comes for us” but they are condemned for not believing in Christ and for wanting to conquer His Church, with a more pure and worthy Church they could be converted and saved, as they are now they go to hell headlong!]
--
But let's continue here with the article. “This Assembly (i.e. the participants of the synod) invites to give full implementation to all the opportunities provided for in the existing law [the one they are going to want to implement as new existing law] regarding the role of women, especially in those places where they remain unimplemented [they want to stick their knives in the jugular vein of Holy Tradition], there are no reasons that prevent women from assuming leadership roles in the Church [yes there are reasons, there are the writings of St. Paul], you will not be able to stop what comes from the Holy Spirit [satanists call Holy Spirit those things that are inspired by the devil]. So they see all these ideas, these innovations, all these changes that they propose in the synod, they see it as coming from the Holy Spirit, that is why they say: “It will not be possible to stop what comes from the Holy Spirit”. Do you realize, brothers and sisters? Something that never existed in the Church, now they say that it comes from the Holy Spirit? [remember what the priest Olivera Ravasi explained, that the Church can grow being faithful to herself but not with changes that deform her] And that is what I meant when I told you that the document feels as if it were a kind of foundational document of a new religion, of a new Catholicism. It really feels that way, it also has a flavor of a declaration of independence. It seems as if from the conclusion of this synod of synodality and the publication of this final document that would be like the manifesto of the people, instead of the pope's exhortation, it seems as if it is year zero, when all things begin, it is when it is reset. In fact it had not occurred to me but it would seem to be a kind of reset.
--
When I was reading the document it feels like a kind of reset. That is what I have been referring to when I speak of a kind of foundational document, of a reset, like the founding of a new religion. Like a declaration of independence from the ancien régime (---) The truth is that I find the document horrible, not because of the things it mentions, that it is simply quoting what we all already know. I find it terrible, I dislike the document very much. I am not saying that 100% of the things they are expressing are false or that there is nothing that is being quoted from Catholic teaching. But the problem is not that which is repeated, which we already know is part of the Catholic Church. The problem is the multitude of innovations, the multitude of new ideas that lead us to contradict what we have always practiced. That is what I am referring to. When the Church condemns a heresy it is not because 100% of what is being taught in that heresy is false, but the Church condemns a heresy precisely because it has some points in which it deviates, it has some essential points in which it takes a different direction. In that sense is that I am using a word... it has points where it really deviates and goes against what the Catholic Church has always believed and practiced. But, going back to the article, it says: “what comes from the Holy Spirit cannot be stopped. The question of women's access to diaconal ministry also remains open. It is necessary to continue discernment in this regard. The Assembly also invites to pay greater attention to the language and images used in preaching, teaching, catechesis, and the writing of official Church documents [they pretend to be the gestapo within the Church to persecute the faithful remnants] giving greater space to the contribution of women saints, theologians and mystics.” [He makes a gesture that I share as if to say “what idiocy and what is coming.”]
--
“The Assembly also stressed the urgency of creating new lay ministries to support the evangelizing mission in the communities . In order to adapt to current needs , the Synod urges dioceses to recognize and form lay people in ministerial roles, both in liturgy and in ministerial and pastoral roles, in response to contemporary demands.”
[they want the laity to give the sacraments which IS NOT ACCEPTED BY HEAVEN EVER. And if they wanted to evangelize, they would go back to Holy Tradition because the Latin Masses were filled with truly believing people, but no, they are attacking Holy Tradition which does call believers].
So here we see that they are changing the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church where it is no longer the priests who are carrying out the ministry, now they want it to be the laity, as the Lutherans already do, as the Anglicans already do. If someone thinks that these are original ideas, if someone imagines that these are innovations for the Catholic... because when we talk about them being innovations within the context of the Church... but in reality they are not innovations, that is, original ideas, all this is already practiced in Anglicanism, in Lutheranism, in the Presbyterians, in other words, in Protestantism. And if you were wondering what I meant when I said that this document is like a continuation of the Protestant process, then these things that the Protestants practice are being brought into the Church. [min 17:27 of 47]
[And Jesus is going to purify it with much pain for the Church and the world, the lukewarm Catholics chose, the infiltrated shits chose, now the consequences will come, unless the repulsion that there is against Francis and the Bergoglians turns into facts that will clean the Church and return it to the Holy Tradition].
Added comments
1
"[anti]pope declares: you must convert yourselves to the synodal church"
--
I remain with the Church of Jesus Christ and I remind priests, bishops and cardinals that they have the DUTY TO DEFEND THE HOLY DOCTRINE OF JESUS CHRIST AS THE CHURCH ALWAYS FOLLOWED IT UNTIL PAUL VI allowed certain Catholics to receive communion in the hand (which is sacrilege), he paid for his errors with martyrdom.
I remind you that Pontius Pilate is in hell because he did not defend Jesus Christ knowing that He was innocent. Now if you are also cowards and do not make a serious effort to excommunicate the antipope and all the scandalous and heretics, remember that cowards are the first to go to eternal hell (the second death) Revelation 21:8.
--
2
“The pope ceases to be the vicar of Christ if he preaches things contrary to the Gospel, e.g. if he says: you have heard that the Gospel says such and such but I say to you.”
Then clearly this antipope is not the vicar of Christ since he preaches that all religions lead to God, and by his example he is the greatest heresiarch in history.
3
Did you understand that what the antipope is doing in the Church, together with jews, gypsis, nazis, lgtbiq, socialists, freemasons, communists, abortionists, feminists and other satanists provokes wars that nobody wants but that that are sent by THE DIVINE JUSTICE?
THOSE MOB MUST LEAVE THE CHURCH IMMEDIATELY.
WE DO NOT OFFEND GOD WITHOUT PUNISHMENT
if this society is killing babies and children purity it deserves to be destroyed by criminals.