[Homemade transcription and translation of the video on the Synod on Synodality by Father Javier Olivera Ravasi on his youtube channel: "Que no te la cuenten - Apólogética histórica y contra-revolución cultural"].
INTRODUCTION]
--
.... .... Next month, on October 2023, especially on the day dedicated to St. Francis of Assisi, the Saint most similar to our Lord Jesus Christ, as it is said in the history of the Church, the Synod of Synodality will begin, will take place in the eternal city, in Rome [ https://youtu. be/jGTzyXm1bwo ] let's explain very briefly what that is because it is an event that will surely be commented in many places, in many internet sites, journalism, in the press... even though up to now it has been said that journalism will not be able to participate in that event [unclear words, but yes, journalism will be able to ask questions, etc.]
--
What is this synod? Briefly, I am going to comment on it first.
--
In Greek the prefix .... [and he explains the etymology of the word synod and summarizes that] in Greek it means "with way" "to walk with" [and he also comments on it in Latin] and it means "to walk together" and it has its correlate in the history of the Church, there were many synods that in general are local synods in order to analyze the pastoral in some moment of the history of the Church, for example "how we evangelize the aborigines here in Latin America", "how we define the ecclesiastical discipline in Toledo, in Spain"....
--
well. A synod is a meeting of bishops, in this case the synod of the so-called synodality, although it seems a bit strange, something like "the Church of ecclesiality" or "the marriage of matrimoniality", well, a bit strange the title, I admit it, but it tries to be a process [unclear words] to analyze how to carry the Church forward, there is really a lot of talk about what is "ecclesial conversion", a certain conversion towards a new face, a new face, that is what is said about the synod of synodality.
--
[my note: in reality what they want is to dynamite the structure of the Church so that only rubble remains (all the same and on the ground, without organization except a chattering of ignorant people) and not to face the prevailing satanism. If you do not read my Facebook, read the posts I copied under the heading "news /news" and the title: Synod of Synodality].
--
And they have been preparing for a couple of years now. If you think about it, the famous synod of bishops back in 2015. And more than trying to... (we will comment on this in a moment) to reach a definition, it is said, "to begin a process". It is said that time exceeds space. An attempt is made to open a process. A process that we have to bring to a successful conclusion. With irony: One walks... -where are you going? -I walk, -Where to? -I walk. One always has an end. They say in philosophy that the first thing in the intention is the last thing in the execution.
--
[Susana's note: This is great, I point out at this point what he said about philosophy, which says that the first thing in the intention is the last thing to be realized and, I come to the conclusion that, if a murderer wants to kill his victim, he takes her off THE ROAD traveled by strong people of good will, who could help her, and takes her to a lonely path, or worse: full of his henchmen, and there he kills her. Moving forward in the video, he tells us that a tiny percentage of people (I clarify: many of them unworthy of receiving Holy Communion) participated in the diocesan surveys for the synod. Meditate (a help: we are infiltrated up to our noses with Jews who receive Communion in mortal sin because they do not believe in Jesus Christ as God, they are unworthy to receive Holy Communion, they kill Him when they receive it. This has been going on since the time of St. Paul, but now they do not even kneel during the Consecration... now it is more scandalous).
--
It is that the infiltrated infidels who have destroyed the Catholic families want their "great assembly" or their sanhedrin. They hate the Church, they hate the 10 Commandments, they hated the prophets...They think they will be happy when they destroy the Church as their group of communists think they will be happy when they destroy the West and the truth is that within their groups they live in slavery and depression. As Cain must have thought that by killing his brother Abel he would free himself from the corrosive envy he had inside, but no, he was expelled to a worse environment than the one he lived in before. The participation of the (pseudo) faithful in decision making is a guideline given by the devil to his illuminati (sorcerers infiltrated in everything), he said that when that happens, there will be so much hatred that even the cardinals will leave the Church.
It is up to us to make fastings, vigils, sacrifices against this synod.
Video continues:]
--
Let us analyze this. The so-called Instrumentum laboris [ https://youtu.be/jGTzyXm1bwo ] this text that came out in the month of June of this year 2023 which is perfectly visitable in the official page of the Vatican [it shows us the link: https://www.synod.va/] is something like the working instrument that is going to be used from 20-23 to analyze the points of the synod on synodality. This document was in turn preceded by many consultations with the people of God, as it is now called, or "the faithful people", although we could also say the unfaithful people since many were consulted without necessarily being Catholics. You can read the instrumentum laboris on the official website, but I have also come across this book that has generated some controversy, which is also available on the Internet [https://synod2023.info], which is this book that I have here, which we are about to comment on, called The Synodal Process - A Pandora's Box - 100 questions and 100 answers, by José Antonio Ureta and Julio Loredo de Izcue. It has the preface by Cardinal Burke [he shows the covers]. The preface by Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, ...we once interviewed him here a couple of years ago. For those who do not know him, he is an American cardinal who was at the time (Benedict XVI's time) Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, which means something like "the president of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation", a nation, in this case the Vatican. He is a canonist of great renown.
--
I am sincere, at the beginning I did not want to read this book because one comes hearing things about the synod of synodality of all kinds, I do not have time and finally on a trip, I was invited by the Episcopal Conference of Bolivia (I went to the brother country to give a lecture on Catholic education, on how progressivism is getting into Catholic education even today) and upon returning from my trip to Bolivia I had a couple of dead hours and I started to read the book. I thought it was going to be a book that was going to criticize the Church, that it was going to be unfounded, that it was going to be a book only to see the scandals... one is not an ostrich that puts its head in the ground... but the truth is that I was wrong, I was very prejudiced. I started to read the text (I had interviewed Julio Loredo Izcue in this channel, he has an excellent, excellent book entitled: "La teología de la liberación, salvavidas de plomo para los pobres") [Liberation theology, a plumber life vest for the poor] and the truth is that I found a jewel -why? Because from the point of view of the sources - you know that I am a doctor in history and in philosophy, I have done two doctoral theses, therefore I know how to work with sources, it is a text not only excellently founded but also with a very, very equanimous tone, very prudent, precise, so it was not something crazy what I was reading, it was not crazy. The truth is that it caught my attention, I read it in a couple of hours and what did I do? What I did was simply... I tried to make a review of the book and I wrote it, I published it on my website: www.quenotelacuenten.org, I wanted to make a video as I am doing now live but there was no connection, and so I said: when I am calmer I will do it and publish it. So my intention is the following: to comment to you through the Instrumentum Laboris that I read and through the book that I have here: "The Synodal Process, a Pandora's Box - 100 questions and 100 answers" simply to read to you the texts that I have been marking in that book, which in turn are based on the footnotes. Everything that is said there has its basis in the footnotes and they are taken from the official pages of the Holy See or the Congress of Bishops [¿?] or from some interview given by a Bishop or Cardinal or whoever, but I reiterate: super but super measured for those who say "no, this is crazy", well... anyway....
--
--
An important detail: the text, with Cardinal Burke's preface, was published before the Instrumentum Laboris document, but as we will see at the end, these comments confirm what was stated in the Instrumentum Laboris.
--
[ANALYSIS BEGINS]
--
The excerpts that I am going to project to you from this book... sometimes it will not be necessary to make any comment... at other times it will be more necessary. As I said then, in the preface is Cardinal Burke, he also has this cover of the booklet [photo at minute 10:13 and following and he says that the lines are overlapping because he had to transfer it from pdf to power point but he clarifies that the edition of the book is clear]
--
Good. Let's read some things [Note: I clarify that as it is forbidden to reproduce the book without permission, and I wrote to them but they did not answer me yet, I will try not to transcribe what he reads from the book of Tradition Family and Property (The Synodal Process is a Pandora's box), but I will try to ponder the idea without reproducing exactly the words, but sometimes it is so summarized that I have no choice but to transcribe the sentence] , [he reads that there is a plan underway in the Church that could subvert it to its foundations]. That is what the authors of the text affirm. [He talks about the 2 sessions planned in Rome in 2023 and 2024] Initially it was going to be a single session in 2023 and Pope Francis decided to make it two.
We reiterate, Pope Francis always says that it is more important to "open processes" than to define issues, right? well, that can have its advantages and sometimes its disadvantages, because a process that is opened and then does not reach a conclusion... or that can be confusing, also has its problems. I'm talking about the reality, right?
--
[he reads in the introduction that it is proposed to reform the Church to make it a constitutively synodal Church and gives the footnote that alludes to a preparatory meeting for the synod of Bishops of the year 21] What does this mean, an assembly, a constitutively synodal Church? That it is permanently in process. This is what is means, isn't it? Here I am analyzing it from the factual point of view, right? [And it says in English "don't kill the messenger". This is what is being proposed. Just in case something doesn't seem right to anyone, I am simply putting my head down here, nothing more.
--
[I suppose he meant that he is "landing ideas" and he reads that the change they want to make in the Church would be radical and that the word "conversion" is mentioned a lot.]
--
This word "conversion" appears many times in the Instrumentum Laboris and strangely in the whole document the word sin is never mentioned.
--
--
[my note: a great doctor of the Church, St. Therese, the little flower, marked one year of her life in her biography as the year of her conversion and she was aware that she had never stained her baptismal dress. But surely it is not in that sense in which the instrumentum laboris speaks but always the satanists want to pass on their burden to the sheep of Christ and since they have to be converted they speak of conversion in the Church while, as it could not be otherwise, they try to destroy it]
--
Well, just in case, I was reading the text... , ... well, "the synod does not intend to discuss doctrinal or pastoral questions". Well, in other words, at the beginning there will not be any new doctrinal thing or anything, that is to say, in principle, if one does not know about this synod, one does not cease to be Catholic, in principle. [He continues reading about the ecclesial process and says:] here we are going to read a lot, a lot, a lot in the document of a process to reform the Church. One of the things that is raised is that the Church has been very much attacked and hit by the criminal processes carried out since the year 2000, more or less, against Catholic priests for sexual abuses, precisely as you know, and I always say it, more than 80% of the abuses of the clergy towards victims were homosexual abuses, 20% were heterosexual abuses, lay statistics and ecclesiastical statistics, it doesn't matter. He goes on to explain the point of view of the Instrumentum Laboris: on this basis, the Church should be given a new face, a new face and therefore an "ecclesial conversion" should be sought, a conversion to reach out more to the people, to the peoples, in short. This is what is proposed.
--
[My note: since 80% were abused by homosexuals, what should be done is to kick all effeminate people out of the priesthood and anyone who has "same-sex projection" and be very careful not to let homosexuals into the seminary or Church activities. You know that the catechism commands us to treat them with delicacy IF THEY DO NOT HAVE HOMOSEXUAL ACTS IN THEIR LIFE, IF NOT, THEY ARE THROWN OUT, but it also commands them not to have activities that involve being at the head of groups in the Church. Instead, what the antipope wants and does is to put pro-homosexual homosexuals in Church activities. The opposite of logic].
---------------------
I will continue translating and commenting the 1hour 20 minutes video.
PART II
Transcript of the video on the SYNOD OF SYNODALITY by Father Ravasi posted on this Facebook on September 23 (part II). My comments on [ ].
--
[I had read in several articles on the internet that the press was invited to listen and ask questions and I thought that Father Olivera Ravasi was in error. No. He was right and the articles that I had read were wrong].
--
[in part I, I said that what antipope Francis does of bringing homosexuals into Church activities, when sexual attacks in the Church are 80% of homosexuals... and I clarify that it would not be solved by legalizing homosexuality since the FBI files say that 80% of homosexuals are homosexuals because in their childhood they were homosexually attacked by a family friend. That's right: they are the biggest child predators there are, and if they wanted to they would have their activities restricted to their adult group, but they don't. The activities of Antipope Francis are evidenced as being done by a satanic infiltrator, a Masonic infidel supported by the Jews (internal to the Church and external) who in turn supports the other infidels (Muslims) and heretics (Protestants, etc.) and abortionists and lgtbi. This has to stop, because the individual will not stop trying and trying to destroy the Church. He should have already been thrown out when he made the idolatrous ceremony for the synod of Panamazonia (the individual wanted to introduce the idols of the aborigines as part of the Holy Religion and for that he put "the first stone" with that ceremony. That scandal must be eliminated, Francis must be declared ANTIPOPE. Now he wants a church that instead of seeking the will of God seeks the will of scandals and infidels infiltrators infiltrators and outsiders, and that they define a church that we could not call the Church of Jesus Christ. That is why they laid the first stone by making the "popular" consultation.
--
Remember that I told you, with data, that the first attack is made by the devil in the Church and if he triumphs then he quickly applies it to the world. Another example: Benedict XVI's coat of arms had a black man with very red lips and an earring, immediately after that 2005 homosexual "marriages" and the adoption of innocent children by those sick people against nature were approved in almost all Latin America. I suppose that if the destructive reform that the so satanic Francis wants were to be carried out, it would be the previous step to destroy all the democracies of the world (which have their hierarchies) and to give way to world communism ("the slavery of the peoples"). I am sure that this is the step the devil is waiting for. Judaism is communism, those unhappy people think they are going to be happy world dominators, but they do not remember their own history of betrayals to God and complete unhappiness most of the time. Approx. 70 years after they killed Jesus Christ (God made Man), they were driven out of Israel until WW2. Now they want to destroy the Church and then peace will be eradicated from the planet (not that the Church can be destroyed, but it would go back to the catacombs, etc.). They do not have enough neurons to reason, they think that a world war would bring them benefits and that they can always rebuild and replant. But they ignore the Word of God. They do not understand that in the past there were more real Catholics, more decency and God was more honored. --Now they only provoke His wrath in every possible way and there is little time left to try to convert everyone and return to the good decent times.
--
This synod is corrupt because it does not seek the light from above but the rottenness from far below. They do not listen to God but to the devil. This synod must be interrupted because it is vitiated. The world must not give an opinion for the synod since the world, together with the devil and the flesh are the enemies of the soul.
--
I tell you the Argentinean case: there was a corrupt parliamentary debate on abortion. I say corrupt because abortion is forbidden by the Constitution, a debate could not be held to decide whether to approve it. But a first debate was tolerated and the pro-lifers won with a very close result. 3 years later the debate was held again (and they would have repeated it 40 times until the result suited them) and the pro-death side won. The failure was in not respecting the Constitution and letting the first debate take place.
--
Pray, fast and make sacrifices because most of the hierarchy and so called Catholics are infiltrated infiltrators. We are very few but... God Almighty hears us!
--
[I make it clear that what Antipope Francis is trying to do is not even democratic, but the mess he was already sending the young people to make years ago. Because in a democracy there is order and hierarchies. The antipope intends to make a mess against Priestly Ordination and its functions and the power given to them by Jesus. The antipope wants assemblies of ignorant people, most of them in mortal sin, to discuss and rethink everything. The Church has to do with the Kingdom of Christ, not with any democracy].
--
There is the Vaticanist opinion, one can agree or not, but Jean Marie Renoir [ I do not know if it is well written, look for the last name on page 13 of the book: The Synod on Synodality... because I downloaded it but I cannot find it in my archives] says: [I can't transcribe verbatim but it's a paragraph where he talks about Francis' major reform (this synod) which aims to convert the Church from clericalized, pyramidal, centered to a decentralized, democratic community where power is shared more with the laity. ]
--
Here one might say, where does he get this from? Well, we will see about the pyramid later on. The Prefect or former Prefect of the former Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, or what is called the Dicastery [unclear words] Cardinal Müller, speaking about the synodal process especially in Germany, I quote: [he quotes the paragraph where Cardinal Müller says that there are those who dream of a church completely alien to the Catholic faith and want to abuse this synodal process to make the Catholic Church go not only in another direction but worse: towards its destruction]. We are especially going to see it but not in detail because this is tiring, this has happened especially in the German synod. Very much criticized, by the way, by Pope Francis, even admonished by Pope Francis to change the approach, to convert to the Catholic faith, well, evidently, as you know, the Germans are quite radicalized perhaps because of their closeness to the Protestant world, but they have not listened to the Pope or to the Cardinals who have admonished them and they are proposing any nonsense, from the priestly ordination of women, a subject already defined by the Church for centuries and for a biblical question, to the blessing of same-sex couples (homosexuals, punctually), They do not go backwards, on the contrary, they accelerate... as the saying goes: the movement accelerates towards the end. Well, what else does it say... there is an example, the example of the Church of England is raised, a path that has failed. (minute approx. 16:20)
--
Well, let's get to the texts, we are still here in the introduction.
These authors state that this process already had a correlate in the history of the Church with what is known as "conciliarism". "As much as it presents itself as modern and updated, the synodal spirit is nourished by ancient errors and heresies" let's see some... which does not mean that they are of the Church but of some characters of the Church who are raising this. right? [reads:] "Already at the beginning of the 15th century, with the pretext of adapting the Church to the new mentality of humanism, the so-called "conciliarist" current arose, which sought to reduce the hierarchical power of the Pope in favor of a conciliar assembly: the Church was to be structured as the will of the expression of the faithful grouped in local or regional synods, largely autonomous, each with its own language and customs. And these synods were to meet periodically in a general synod or 'holy synod' which held the highest authority in the Church". The Pope was reduced to a "primus inter pares", a "first among equals", right? right. In other words, this is a process that was tried in other centuries and did not work.
--
[It didn't work, just as the homosexuality of Sodom didn't work, nor did homosexuality ever work, only as a dark-grotesque spectacle to see a man with feminine ways. Now something similar is happening: for the spectacle they give everything, they want to be entertained even with garbage and TV is molding them... not only the tastes or the acceptance of mortal sins, since they are bombarded so much with movies that people end up accepting what TV proposes, but, for example, the socialist party in Spain is always talking about "change", "change" may be because the TV has already trained people that when they are bored of something they change the station... and subliminally they try to attract the votes of those who are bored... bored of life, since the only thing they do with TV is to kill time. TV itself makes life boring, you don't do vital things but you vegetate like a piece of furniture watching it. It is a snake that bites its own tail.
--
--
The same TV sterilizes intelligence and initiative (something very profitable for the leftists) and trains you to expect a "hero" to save the situation in every problem that arises. In this way it deforms the multitudes, which it makes them tense by magnifying the mistakes of other governing parties and then giving "siren song" solutions that have no basis to be implemented, but people are waiting for the "hero" that will solve everything and they swallow the easy solution. The left magnifies the little mistakes of the right to the point of tension, but when they have the power, they do not solve anything, in fact, they make it worse and abuse the power. In the past people grouped together and solved things, now "everything is very difficult" because perhaps they are convinced that they are not worth the heroes on TV. Now the socialist party is on the subject of "kisses", kisses all over the place... maybe because, as they want to make a deal with the independentists and that people accept it, they appeal to the cheap sentimentality (rooted in the subconscious) of romantic movies where it is celebrated that after several ups and downs they end up becoming friends.
--
--
In the 60's it was said that TV deformed the mind, now we know that it directly molds it to its liking: movies make you look where the camera directs you, with its silences, the music... makes you feel what they want. And now they use telepathy without you realizing it, which makes you think and feel more acutely what they want. Our Lady of the Roses says there is no excuse for having TV in our homes.
--
TV is teaching children that monsters are their friends, ghosts, the grim reaper... in Teen Titans (cartoons for kids) Robin wanted money to make an investment and calls Batman on the phone saying he wanted to do charity for some kids. He gets the briefcase and makes his real estate investment by buying a ruined building, cheap. But then he tells his partners that there's no business because it's an "old rental" building and he can't raise the rents to the residents. So they set about kicking out the renters who, not coincidentally and we learn at the end of the episode, were all enemy villains who flee without defending themselves, as little old people or civilians would do being illegally evicted by a dictatorial state...and the kids are learning like sponges...don't be amazed without increasing of demon cults in the near future.
--
40 years ago, a month before Easter or Christmas, there were religious movies every day... now the wolf has taken off his sheep's clothing and only empty movies like "Home Alone" or "How beautiful it is to live" are shown on some broadcasting station... every year. ]
--
And besides, by the way, the Church is hierarchical, one follows the head, because the head is the one who tries to confirm us in the faith. That is... the purpose, the office, the "munus" that the Pope has and that the Bishops have. Every bishop has the office and in turn the burden of confirming the brethren in the faith. It is not a question of democracy, is no? [the "no?" is said as a catchphrase, not as a question. I will stop writing it when he says it] "well, let us come to an agreement... I do not know, the Church of Bolivia, the Church of Colombia, the Church of the USA, the Church of Germany and then we will see that the Pope accepts our customs... if in Africa we think that polygamy is okay in some tribes... then let the Pope accept us like this. No. No. There is a deposit of faith which is what the Church always tries to defend, doctrinally speaking. And not because the Bishop changes, not because the Pope changes as if he were a new president, he will have a different style, a different charisma and will defend truths that are no longer found in the deposit of faith. That would happen with a country, with a president... the president changes, the State policy changes and therefore, I don't know, education is going to be from now on pro lgbt, or against lgbt... Bolsonaro is coming in Brazil, one thing, Lula is coming in Brazil... another different thing. No. That is not the way the Church is, there is no any "enlightened one" who is changing the doctrine.
--
---
This book is made between questions and answers (19:39), because it was done pedagogically in this way, it is an achievement because it helps that in a very short book, almost an opuscule, one can see in questions and answers, with the sources at the foot of the page, the most interesting topics. The first and elementary question is what a synod of bishops is. It is a permanent organism of the Catholic Church external to the Roman Curia that represents the episcopate. Notice that it is called a synod of bishops. A strange thing because we are going to see that there are going to be many lay people, almost 25% will be composed of lay people in fact, even women, there is a quota for women, ...inclusiveness is also included here.
--
[I already clarified, and I filed it in my blog in "News" with the title "the synod of synodality is not a synod" that the satanists infiltrated in the Church put de facto the laity and women at the level of the bishops and then they want this to be approved for the Church].
--
It has a purely consultative function but may have a deliberative function when the Pope grants it. In other words, in principle it is a consultation. Period. But once all this is over, in principle, the decision could be taken that the final document should also have a correlate at the level of an attempted magisterium. Why do I say "attempted magisterium"? Because it is necessary to know that there is the definitive magisterium or better called ex cathedra when the Pope defines a topic on faith and morals, and according to infallibility. There is also the ordinary magisterium of the Church, when the Pope simply says what the Church has always said, repeats the same thing, deepens in any case topics of faith or morals. And there is also the so-called "personal" or pontifical magisterium of a Pope, ...the personal magisterium of Leo XIII on some topic, some theological or political discussion where Pontifical Infallibility is not strictly at stake. There have been Popes in history who were wrong even on some issues, even personal, even political, even in some pastoral and even doctrinal, but which he did not want to define as dogma of the Church, which will respect his opinion as a private doctor, but only up to that point. As we always know, for something to be magisterium of the Church it has to be in consonance with what the Church has always taught. We call that the Ordinary Magisterium. If tomorrow comes, let us give you a hypothesis, if tomorrow comes in the year 2700, if we arrive, a Pope comes totally... who goes crazy and from then on starts to say: from today on stealing is allowed, in any circumstance... or: fornicating inside or outside marriage, with a woman who is not yours inside or outside marriage, with a man or with another man... it is not a sin. That is not the magisterium of the Church, that is the personal pontifical magisterium of the erring, mistaken one whom I should not follow, because it goes against the deposit, against what is deposited. I reiterate: the Church does not have the truth insofar as she is the owner of it, in any case she is the administrator of the truth, as the Bride of Christ the Master, Christ the Bridegroom.
--
--
[he reads] Are the conclusions of the synod binding in themselves? No. In the past, the final document of a synod of bishops had no magisterial value since its role was to give suggestions to the supreme pontiff.
--
[But this synod is marked with the type of non-synod that Bergoglio wanted to make to his own measure in order to appear to validate "democratically" (with a pre-synod where even heretics and infidels, homosexuals, etc., voted) the changes that this antipope already had in his skull. If you did not read it, read my article "antipope Francis friendly of our enemies", in the "news" section. It is clear to us that any change against the Holy Tradition goes against the Magisterium and cannot be accepted. Already this synod is rotten from its base].
--
[he reads] After the reforms introduced by Pope Francis [I say clearly that he is an antipope] in 2015, the final document becomes directly part of the ordinary magisterium if it is expressly approved by the pontiff. This interests us not because of what is going to be said now, what is going to be consulted, but because of the end, which obviously one as a Catholic, as a son of the Church want it to be "as it should be" that it does not contradict in anything.... -What happens, Father, if it contradicts what ...? -It will not be necessary to follow something because obviously they will have made a mistake, if there is infidelity. If this synod or any other synod were to say... "from now on abortion is okay", no matter whoever says it, I cannot follow it.Because I follow the catechism, what the Bible says because it is very simple: the deposit of faith. That is why I trust in God who also knows how to do His work.
--
[God warned us in the messages of Our Lady of the Roses (https://www.tldm.org/Bayside ), which were forbidden by a bishop traitor to the laws of the Church... that there is a danger of schism but that we must always stay in the Church, praying and giving good example. That we must pray to the Holy Spirit to enlighten us (always, even to read the news) to avoid false obedience.
-------------
PART III
PART III of Priest Olivera Ravasi's video on the Synod on Synodality.
--
[my comments between [ ], I start at minute 24:20 approx.]
--
[Read:] "Can a synod of bishops or a Pope change the doctrine or the structures of the Catholic Church?"
Well, obviously we know that no, not a Pope can do that, "nor an angel from Heaven" says St. Paul, "not even if an angel from Heaven were to come" -- well, we know that from the catechism -- "if an angel from Heaven were to come and teach you a different gospel..." [He's quoting St. Paul in Galatians 1:8 "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.."]
--
"What changes did Pope Francis introduce at the synod of bishops?" I'm quoting: [I can't copy verbatim but the paragraph talks about the Pope wanting the whole people of God to be consulted and that he proposed a new plan to create a new synodal church]. [now he explains:] The premise is that because of the supernatural sense of faith, the so-called "sensus fidei", "sensus": sense and "fidei": of faith, the whole people of God cannot err. This is absolutely true. Good. It is "infalible in credentos" [check my spelling when I write Latin words], all the faithful people, all the baptized, by a natural sense of the sheep [and he makes the gesture of breathing as if smelling something] This supernatural instinct, we would say, in the case of faith, on a specific subject, cannot all be mistaken at the same time. Because God has given them a certain infallibility "in credendo", in belief, to all the faithful people. This is something similar to what happened in the fourth century, the time of Arianism, where the vast majority of the bishops, even the Pope (although there is a discussion on that subject) believed that Jesus Christ was not God, that He was a creature, a man, very good one, super creature, if you will, but that He was not God. Only God was God the Father, God the Son, no, no... Jesus Christ was not God the Son. Period. But the faithful people, the vast majority of the faithful people, kept the dogma of the faith. The same thing happened with the Virginity of Mary, our Lady. When the dogma of the virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mary was declared, well, the same thing.
--
[A letter of St. Athanasius, one of the Fathers of the Church, to his faithful, who had been expelled from the churches because the Roman emperor favored the Arians, (now they call themselves "messianic j-s" (I can not put the last full name but they are those who insisted that Pilate delivered Jesus, but let's continue calling them in this post: Arians because if not, Facebook doesn't allow me to publish the post) and we have the hierarchy, churches, seminaries, etc.. infested with them and as they are the majority they want to enforce a pseudo-democracy, they have already removed the tabernacles from the main place and put themselves in the main place...):
--
Letter of Saint Athanasius to his flock:
May God console you! ...What saddens you ...is the fact that others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises-but you have the apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith? The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in this struggle -the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith?
True, the premises are good when the apostolic Faith is preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way ...You are the ones who are happy: you who remain within the church by your faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has come down to you from apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis.
No one, ever, will prevail against your faith, beloved brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day.
Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray.
Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ.
--
--
[Father Ravasi reads the paragraph where he says that the flock has its sense of smell to find the paths that the Lord opens for them, that the synodal church would be "of reciprocal listening".] Well, the people to the hierarchy, the hierarchy to the people, well, in short.
--
[reads:] "What justification does Pope Francis offer for this radical alteration of the synod of bishops?" ...This question of how to handle it from now on? According to Pope Francis the bishops are both teachers and disciples. I am quoting: "teachers, it is true, when they proclaim the Word of Truth in the name of Christ, Head and Shepherd, but also disciples when, (I quote) knowing that the Spirit has been given to every baptized person, they listen to the voice of Christ who speaks through the whole people of God, making them infalible in credendo. In other words: if all the people of God agree on only one point and have always believed the same, that which St. Vincent de Lérins told us is the Tradition of the Church... that which has always been believed... everywhere and by everyone. It was always, always believed that the Virgin Mary was Virgin before, during and after childbirth. Everywhere, [he gives an example] in France as well as in America, in China as well as in... well, and by everyone, not by a couple of irresponsible people who said something, but by all the faithful people, well, there is the infallibility "in credendo", which is the faith of the faithful people, the faith of the simple people, which is the faith of the people who still believe in Jesus Christ, as Rubén Darío, the Nicaraguan poet, used to say that the people, even when they do not necessarily go to Mass or when they are not practicing, still believe in the truths of the faith. In spite of what some irresponsible priest might explain to them in his Sunday homily after having read these "advanced" theologians of the twentieth century [citing names I do not know and do not know how to write, I thank God], they are still believing in the truths of the faith.
--
[The problem is that these times are not the same as before, now there is much darkness, confessionals have been removed from most churches, people have almost no conscience of sin, Catholics have almost disappeared and what there are are Arian infidels who came and come to destroy, kill and steal. The hierarchy has been replaced by clones related to the Arians and their masters, the planners of only one world, children, families, do not go to Mass for lack of good catechesis, most (almost all) Catholics and even the non satanic j-s have disappeared from our cities .... and the Arians want to make in the Church an imitation of their assemblies, like the hosts that they take out of the tabernacles... they take out 50 and consecrate no more than 5, always... they pretend to make of our Masses the sacrifice of communion that they made in the temple of the Old Testament, simple bread. Those mob who preach that God does not punish anyone, who do not know why the sacrifice of the cross... and ask in the homily at Mass: Could not God have done something different? And he answers himself: I do not know. And there ends the homily of the infiltrated Arian. That mob that groups together young people who sing songs that sound like whores panting... That mob calls itself "the people of God" because they hate to say Catholic Church. And democracy... we already know that we vote in our countries but the presidents are elected by the one-world planners because their henchmen are controlling all the organisms... That democracy that they want to impose in the Church is to ask sepulchers who hate us about where to take the Church... Democracy does not work anymore... and they want to put it in the Church.
--
About that satanic pseudo-democracy, I read yesterday, 10.17.23, about a school in USA: Miami Springs school, Academy of Innovative Education <<where a teacher [of 4th grade] decided to show his students Winnie the Pooh: Honey and Blood, the gore-riddled slasher parody that turns Winnie the Pooh and Piglet into bloodthirsty killers.
Far from doing what any sane teacher would do, remove the film, the teacher kept the screening going for 20 to 30 minutes, some parents tell CBS News, even though some students protested and indicated they "didn't want to see that."
The excuse given by the teacher is rather vague, as he discharges responsibility by stating that it was the kids who chose the movie. Obviously, parents have reproached that he should have reviewed the material to verify that Winnie the Pooh: Honey and Blood is definitely not for children. >> I think it was an experimentation for the pseudo-democracy they want to impose in the Church, children who don't know what it is about (they must have thought it was the real Winnie the Pooh) and sadists dirtying their souls, taking them down paths they don't want to go... at first, because once they have a dirty soul because of what got into their eyes, the devil keeps doing his work from the inside...
--
Our Lady of the Roses commands us, among other things, to read the writings of the Founding Fathers, the Bible every day for at least 15 minutes, and to teach our children the stories of the Bible... the catechesis will be given to the children at home because don't even dream that the school or the church will give it to them. God will make ALL PARENTS responsible for the fall of their children's souls].
--
Minute 27:50
"synod on synodality" the theme chosen is "for a synodal church, communion, participation and mission" it is about, according to the Pope, walking together: [he talks about the ethimology of the word synod: to walk together]. Pastors, laity, bishops of Rome, etc. The greatest difficulty that will have to be overcome... and here it will be mentioned a lot, not only in the document, the official document, I mean, the "clericalism that separates the priest, the bishop, from the people".
[If the priests were in the confessionals an hour before each Mass, as it was before, they would have all the closeness they need, more if they (not the extraordinary minister, who are even women) brought Communion to the sick, more if they meditated on God and prayed Rosaries on their knees in the church... but one has to juggle and make inquiries in most churches to go to confession... and that is a stumbling block for many that makes them not go to confession. But it seems that the closeness they want is carnal: to marry (although the vast majority, more than 80%, are already in a couple because they are the Arians) they just want to get rid of the burden of conscience by making all sins legal, which they will never be able to do, they are just dirtying the Church with an illegal pope and his stupid attempts to destroy the Church]
--
There is a lot of talk about there supposedly being a great deal of "clericalism" what is meant by clericalism? I suppose, this kind of authoritarianism of the priest, that sometimes he does not listen to the people, it could be, it is true, maybe it is true that sometimes there is that priest who has that "munus regendi" [I insist that I do not know the spelling of the Latin words], the burden to rule... to command... to shepherd... the people of God. There is a lot of talk about "walking together discover how its line is one of horizontality rather than verticality, he quotes a speech of the Holy Father in the year 21, he talks about instead [that "walking together"] of being something verticalist, be something more horizontal]. [he reads that the synod will not discuss a specific pastoral theme but the very structure of the Church, that is why it is known as the synod of synodality].
--
[This "walking together" horizontally is contrary to the Catholic Church. Jesus Christ is the Way, and the Way passes through the Cross. The Cross has a larger vertical pole pointing to Heaven and a smaller horizontal one. We have to love God more than everything created and our lives and not look for God horizontally but looking upwards. What a beautiful example the girls of Garabandal, who always looked at the Virgin and walked even backwards on steep descending paths with stones and never fell down. The Church must turn back from those humanist and modernist ways, in short: Satanist, that the infiltrated assassins have done and take up again the Holy Tradition, what always was, is and will be the true Church of Jesus Christ, the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church].
------------
PART IV
PART IV of priest Olivera Ravasi's talk on the synod of synodality.
--
Beginning at about 29:50 minutes.
--
This is not a specific issue, as we were saying at the beginning, such as whether or not priests have to marry, whether Communion should be given to children at the age of 6 or before, whether Confirmation should come before or after Communion... no. It is an issue of the whole Church in general, of how the Church has to be managed from now on, this is what it is all about. I am talking about the concrete texts. [he reads:] "Does this synod wish to come to certain conclusions or to initiate a process?". This is super important. [he reads:] "Unlike other general synods, this synod on synodality does not intend to discuss doctrinal or pastoral questions," this we said before, "but to undertake a process of reform of the Church. To open a path. [my comment is that they want to open a way to all mortal sins within the Church, a way that is not that of Christ] The preparatory document for the synod intends to undertake, quote, a participatory and inclusive ecclesial process .
That term "process" appears a lot of times... a lot of times, e.g., "process without taking up space," that famous phrase that has been said a lot lately....
He reads: What implications does have or will have on the life of the Church? This listening to the whole community implies a reformulation of all authority within the Church, according to Pope Francis it would be necessary (and now I quote) to invert the hierarchical structure of the Church... in this Church as an inverted pyramid.... [he makes a triangle with his hands and explains that instead of the Pope being at the top... and inverts the triangle] of a pyramid where at the top is the Pope and at the base the faithful... an inverted pyramid... the top is below the base.
[At minute 31:50 approx. he shows a page of the document where there is a pyramid explaining the current structure of the Church and next to it a world with a crucifix in front of it and many men (paper dummies) shaking hands and forming a circle around the world.Keep in mind that the circle is a geometrical figure very used by satanists. And an inverted pyramid is only stable if it was introduced into a hole...my impression is that they want it to descend towards hell, that is why they want to start putting in people who do not follow The Way but want to continue in their sin, so, going in the opposite direction, they would trip up those who are going up, there would be a direct connection of the hierarchy with hell and remember that the devil will lead the Church for a short time...another possibility for it to stay without falling is: if it is fallen on its side, where the papacy and the hierarchy would be very level with the world and only a proportion of the faithful and consecrated would remain up (Jesus said in the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses that when the Church and the world are one, the end will be near) True Catholics will remain faithful to Holy Tradition and, according to the 3rd Secret of Our Lady of Fatima, there will be many martyrs.... Or, the 3rd situation: maybe the satanists want to keep it inverted and pass it to each other by pushing it from the base, which would be on top, "shaking it..." remember that the "evil men of the Cross" are recrucifying Jesus Christ by crucifying His Mystical Body... He gave Himself and was in evil hands but HE WAS NEVER DISOBEDIENT TO HIS FATHER GOD].
--
--
By inverting the pyramid Francis' analogy reframes authority as dependent on receiving, listening to and learning from others within the church, this from Cardinal Grech, secretary of the synod of synodality.
--
Is there a traditional sense of listening to the faithful people, of pastors?, the book asks. Yes, there is no doubt that, as a pastor, he has the duty to lean over his sheep to listen and understand their spiritual situation and their aspirations, but "listening" today has a different sense, very different, which is the obligation to place oneself in tune with the sheep. The criterion of evaluation ceases to be revealed Truth and the rectitude of conscience and becomes the acceptance of the faithful.
[and shows the page upside down where the crucifix and the faithful and the pyramid are all upside down. He explains:] It is all very well to listen to the faithful, but we know that the faithful are not always faithful. What does this mean? That the faithful are not always... I am also a faithful... the faithful are not always faithful neither to Jesus Christ nor to the Church nor to the Commandments, nor to the Creed. We are in agreement. Then, as a bishop, as a priest, as a pope, whoever, one also has the duty, the burden, the obligation to teach what one has received, to transmit the true faith.
If a member of the faithful comes and tells me that instead of 3 Persons in the Trinity there are 4 "because that is how he felt it"... or if tomorrow a member of the faithful or a priest comes and says something else... Wait a minute, I will listen to you, but just because I listen to you does not mean that I will not correct you. In short.
--
The Catholic Church has always started from the opposite side, say the authors, taking as its foundation first the Truths of the Faith, contained in the Bible and the tradition of the Church, applied according to the circumstances of time and place to enlighten and guide men towards eternal salvation. The tendency of the synod on synodality is the other way around, that is, to start from the concrete situation in order to elaborate a pastoral and a discipline adapted to it. Such a method constitutes a historicist construction, say the authors, which does not start from revealed Truth but from a concrete historical situation to which the Church should adapt herself.
--
[That is horror!!!! Not having Jesus Christ as a principle but the reality of any sinner and "adapting to that"! That would no longer be the Church of Jesus Christ but a formless thing. Remember that the satanists have as their motto "solve et coagula" (dissolve and coagulate)]
--
In [I do not know how to translate the name] "Heglian" terms, we could say that it is part of the spirit of History, of the spirit of this time. It is not that "here are the revealed truths, this is what the Church has always taught us, and therefore we have to see how we adapt this same message, which does not change, to the concrete truth. Example, example: How do I... I am a priest, let's say, Jesuit, or Mercedarian, or whatever... Dominican... I come to Spanish America, XVI century, 1500... I meet some Indians who are cannibals or polygamists, who make human sacrifices... how do I teach them that this is wrong? I can't tell them... "You know what? You better eat with less salt, because salt is bad for you. No?. Another example: "look, I would like you to be monogamous or not incestuous, but well, it would be good to do, if you want to do it... I would like, if you want to do that, treat your wives, your daughters well" ... No. Wait a moment. The Church has always tried to teach what it has received, not what it wants to invent nor to justify to the sheep what the sheep wants to hear.
--
[I am typing this on January 2, 2024 when the Vatican's decision is known (completely opposite to what it said in 2021, that year it said that homosexual couples could not be blessed) now it says that homosexual couples or divorced and remarried people can be blessed. Africa, Eastern Europe and many in America spoke out against it, someone in Spain wants to reconcile it but clarifying that the document is chaotic, another speaks of a coming schism. I clarify that this Francis is an antipope who speaks and writes and works against the Doctrine of Christ, he must be declared antipope. Yesterday I saw an interview he did on abortion saying that he is against it, but he based himself on lies: he said that "the newly conceived is not a person and that at one month all its organs are functioning and that medical books say that it is a living being and then: draw your conclusions." If we follow his satanic speech we are left without weapons in front of the abortionists since they are all lies because from the moment of his conception he IS A PERSON who has received his soul from GOD THE FATHER, only the heart is formed at the month of conception and the medical books say that he is A HUMAN BEING, if we base it on the fact that he is a living being only.... cows and lettuce are living beings and we eat them... but in China (to which the antipope is so fond of, because of communism) they eat embryos. Everything closes. Communism is Satanism and so is Bergoglio]
--
--
[I am going to transcribe and include here, by leaving it on the blog, what a youtube page said and that I published yesterday, January 2, 2024: "We reveal the Church's secret motives for blessing non-heterosexual couples". Which confirms what I wrote to you in these comments. I would like to warn Priest Olivera that his videos are shortened, deleted to the point of leaving only 7 minutes of dissertation... e.g. the one on catechesis on the liturgy and another one I wanted to listen to].
[We are going to have very hard times in the Church, WE HAVE TO STAY IN IT, but it will be led by satan... this test is very simple, my advice to the priests is that, if homosexuals come to him to be blessed, as they cannot be blessed... say: "May God bless you with a sincere conversion to free you from the path of sin that you are following, which ends in hell" and make it clear frequently to his faithful that this is the blessing he gives. Popes can make mistakes when they speak outside the chair of St. Peter and this pope is a constant satanic mistake. And when they speak from the chair of St. Peter, they cannot say whatever they please but only what the Church has ALWAYS believed. Tranquility and trust in Jesus Christ, who is Almighty God, and in His most excellent Mother.
--
--
The reasons I have for giving you the advice in the previous paragraph is that Our Lady of the Roses says that EVERYONE who goes to the sacred grounds (where Her Apparitions were and where She is always waiting for Her children), will be healed of their spiritual illnesses, even those who go to scoff... Also Jesus Christ saved the faith of the Church when He said that the "modern" Mass is valid but that He wants us to return to the Tridentine Mass. Copy and save, better on paper, as well as on a pen drive, all of Our Lady of the Roses].
--
Added 1 to the post on the synod on synodality, part IV
If I had to give advice to priests about the much-touted "blessing of homosexual couples" I would tell them to make it clear to homosexuals or others on the wrong path who approach them: you are of the darkness, we follow the light; you are going downward, we strive to go upward; you are very content with your life of sin, we follow Jesus Christ, therefore there is no place for you in the Church unless you are converted to Christ and the only blessing you can receive is: May God bless you with sincere conversions that will lead you to follow the good way. Go in peace.
--
I did not read the document of the antipope but it is ridiculous to pay attention to an individual who raves: first that homosexual couples cannot be blessed and two years later, that he commands to bless the couple "but not the bond". He has no brains because he was eaten by his father the devil (spiritually speaking) and he has a double speech because that is what the children of the father of liars do.
--
--
Years ago I shared with people my own experience with those who called me names on the bus, on the street, etc. If I got angry my psyche suffered, but if I blessed them, I knew the blessing would bounce back to my loved ones and it did and I even blessed them gladly.I have a lot to thank God for. Remember the words of Jesus Christ: Bless, bless and do not curse.
And do not be idiots enough to give them a foot of room in the church.
--
Today I read that the antipope "excommunicated" the second priest who tells the truth about him. We owe a debt to those valiant ones: that Bergoglio be declared antipope. If they would read me, what I would tell them is that according to Our Lady of La Salette, one day the Church will be as it should be (after much suffering all over the world) and surely Bergoglio will be declared antipope. May God bless them very much to follow the path of holiness that they are on.
ADDED 2
Added 2 to the post on synodality, part iv
--
Perhaps by saying to bless the couple and not the bond is in agreement with the declaration of 2021 but it must be interpreted in "Argentine dialect". Here certain people say, when a mother has a boy and a girl: "ay, the little couple!" and do not even remotely think of them having a loving or sexual bond.
--
Perhaps by referring to "homosexual couples" the antipope is referring to a couple of people and not to their sinful bond. And I continue with the "Perhaps"... perhaps what he wants is to underhandedly accept a homosexual as a woman, which he already did once in the Vatican when he referred to a trans man as a woman. And that is also a sin of scandal.
--
Maybe he is going gradually, like the serpent... and the homosexuals are celebrating because they think they're going to have a place in the Church, they're completely wrong and, if they don't convert, when they're in hell they're going to have to bitterly admit that they've been deceived. Perhaps what is entering the Church are like those metal spikes that got into the flesh of Jesus Christ with the terrible whippings he suffered... but they did not remain in his body, ...which rose glorious.
--
Jesus Christ is still suffering on the cross and on top of it scourged... we know this from the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses... but if there is no conversion of mankind, He will put His cross on all mankind and the general suffering will be dreadful. .
ADDED 3
TRANLATION OF THE POST OF 2 DAYS AGO (the one with the photo of the Vatican, a so called priest and two gays)
--
We reveal the Church's secret motives for blessing non-heterosexual couples.
The Episcopal Conferences are currently facing a crucial dilemma with the application of the declaration "Fiducia Supplicans" drafted by Tucho [Victor Manuel] Fernandez, a leading figure in the Doctrine of the Faith of the Catholic Church. The notable resistance is based on the fact that it is not possible to bless unions in sin, while the doctrine of the faith maintains the opposite. The complexity is compounded by the confusing wording of the document in question, which is the product of influences both external and internal to the Church, even due to the profound process of transformation that the institution is undergoing in its relationship with the contemporary world.
--
Here we will explore the deep-seated reasons that lead many priests to show reticence about blessing irregular couples. We will examine both the internal and external forces that have led the Doctrine of the Faith to produce such a controversial document. And in the end we will discover how this is the result of a great enigma that has plagued the life of the Church in these 2000 years.
[propaganda of this group: Forums of the Virgin Mary].
--
Now, "Roma locuta, causa finita", Rome has spoken and the cause is over, was the usual way of resolving controversial issues and open cases within the Catholic Church. For centuries the solemn word of Rome closed the discussions with forceful pronouncements, but today it is not the case, on the contrary [I say it is because there is an infiltrator in the Vatican who speaks, does and writes contrary to the Truth]. The pronouncements of Rome seem, unfortunately, to increase the confusion and raise the discussion to extremely agitated levels. One could say: "Rome locuta, infinite chaos". And this is not accidental, nor the result of procedural oversights. Like this case of the declaration of the "Fiducia supplicans" of 2023, which breaks with the bimillennial tradition of the Church by opening the possibility of the recognition of non-heterosexual relationships, as long as they are stable, lasting and sincerely animated by mutual affection and respect, which are the characteristics that the document rescues as the good that can be found in the so-called irregular relationships. It is a marked change from the conclusion "God does not and cannot bless sin" which was written in 2021 by the same Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then led by Cardinal Ladaria, thus changing the approach to same-sex couples and other couples who are not sacramentally married, in a matter of two years. Worst of all, there is a feeling within the Church, both among those who fully support the document and those who resist it, that it is a first step in redefining the doctrine on sexuality that the Church has had since its founding. And this idea is held by the non-heterosexual movements, as well as by the press. Prestigious theologians such as Cardinal Müller, prefect emeritus of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, have been militantly opposed to the document. Müller, for example stressed that: "no Catholic priest can be forced against his conscience to perform religious acts - even in private or in secret - that are objectively contrary to faith or and morals" and added that "a priest must help people in sinful circumstances to find the way back" to Christ through counseling and prayer, "and with great patience and care" and that "A fictitious blessing with the Sign of the Cross that those affected perceive as a justification of their behavior against the Holy Will must be avoided at all costs" Concluding that such an act "would be a blasphemy and a sin against the salvation of people, because it encourages them to follow a path that plunges souls into ruin".
--
--
While another prestigious theologian, Tomas Reinandi [I don't know if I spelled the name right], has said that some priests will be willing to bless irregular marriages and same-sex couples and others will be unwilling, so there will be divisions and acrimony within some parishes and within the clergy themselves. The difficulty with this document is that it introduces an extremely radical and profound change, underhand or camouflaged, about which many argue that not even a pontiff can make. For it is about abolishing a revelation of God in the Old Testament and of Jesus Christ in the New Testament. There are even those who are of the opinion that the document is deliberately trying to sow confusion when the faithful need clarity. They even go so far as to say that it is a demonic temptation, which could even lead to legal problems for priests who refuse to bless non-heterosexual couples, citing problems of conscience, because the priest could be publicly denounced for committing a hate crime. So this document could put the Church on a slippery slope from which it will be very difficult to rise. And in the face of all this we should ask ourselves why the Vatican is making such a dangerous move [I say because it is not seeking peace but "to make a mess", as a buffoon of the devil once said], which is producing so much confusion and resistance as never before. Because episcopal conferences have completely opposed the document. The document could perfectly well have called for priests to bless every non-heterosexual person and not the couple, that is, leaving out anything even remotely suggesting that a couple is being blessed. This would have welcomed non-heterosexuals into the Church, into the Love of Christ, as is the intention of the document [I say NO WELCOME TO ANYONE WHO IS IN DEADLY SIN AND WANTS TO REMAIN IN IT. The only homosexuals we can accept are those who do not have relations of the flesh and fight their homosexual tendencies, remember the Catechism of JPII], without seeming to welcome the couple, that is, the bond, which the Church says in the Catechism is something disordered to the precepts of God [in the OT it commands to kill them and in the NT it says, in the Apocalypse, that they go to hell] Jesus blessed them all [???], but He blessed them and told them to "sin no more". And in fact, during the final blessing of each Mass, are not all blessed, without separating those who are in a state of sin from those who are not? [In the holy Tradition if someone was in a mortal sin, he could not enter in the Church except to confess] This is the simple way that the Church could follow and that, moreover, the absolute majority of priests have always followed.
[more invitations to "like" to "signal the you tube algorithm to show the video to more people].
So why such a risky move to supposedly access a claim from such a small population of 4% or 5%, who say the polls say identify themselves as non-heterosexual? how can such small numbers shake the Church structure?
Two complementary reasons come to mind:
One is that the number of non-heterosexuals is not a good indicator of their international influence and power [the world surrendered to the devil and satan supports all sin, the more degrading the more he supports it] the great nations of the west have a clear and aggressive policy to expand non-heterosexual culture everywhere
And the other is that several studies have shown that the proportion of non-heterosexuals within the clergy is significantly higher than in the general population. Studies in the U.S. report a proportion from 15% to as high as 50% of non-heterosexual priests.
--
So why is this change coming now? In addition to the influence of the two reasons mentioned above, there is another fundamental one. A generation has entered the Vatican hierarchy that has a different [satanic] understanding of religion than previous generations. They do not believe that the doctrine of the Church is a truth revealed by God, because they do not believe that God can reveal Himself in this way to human beings. They believe that religion begins with an internal movement of the human heart, a "religious feeling", and not with an external revelation. And then people codify that religious feeling into a doctrine, taking the moral standards of the society of the time. Therefore the Dogma can be changed by the religious sentiment of the people of each epoch. This is modernism. Which is also the basis of the synod of synodality.
Well... so much for what we wanted to talk about the deep reasons why the Vatican has produced the Fiducia Supplicans statement and why there is resistance. And I would like to ask you what you think about the underlying problem of the resistance to Fiducia Supplicans.
.
COMMENTS THAT HAVE PUBLISED BEFORE TRANSLATING PART IV:
--
Father Olivera Ravasi says that the word "clericalism" is mentioned a lot in the instrumentum laboris of the synod. Obviously, it is the same psychology of the devil. Already when they began to give rights to homosexuals, which they do not deserve to have, normal people were accused of being "homophobic" (an invented disease). Now they are preparing to accuse of "clericalism" every priest who defends the organization of the Church as Jesus Christ founded it and who does not let his head be stepped on by "progressive" laymen who join Arianism with all possible sins.
--
Bergoglio also has his satanic psychology repeated. A priest who called him "the antipope of history" was excommunicated. To penitents in sackcloth praying the rosary in the Vatican square, he throws them (via the Vatican police) behind the fences and then sends the Vatican police and the carabinieri. The bishop of Costa Rica who defended his faithful from the Covid vaccine (most of them made from aborted fetuses) is removed from office... and there are many more examples. Bergoglio wants to redefine the Church where all mortal sins fit and Catholics are thrown out. But he can't do anything, he is an illegal pope who should have been thrown out of the Church when he ordered that Christ should not be preached to the infidels, that this was proselytism (he should have been thrown out of the Church as a heretic) or when he led the ceremony of idolatrous worship in the Vatican gardens in 2019 (he should have been named antipope for being an idolater).
He wanted among other things to redefine what CVII was and to throw those of us who disagreed out of the Church. Be careful, because with the illegal synod (which is not a synod) of synodality he will want to do something similar. I copy something that came out in Vatican news:
--
<< In an address to members of the National Catechetical Office on the 60th anniversary of its birth, Francis insisted that the Council is the Magisterium of the Church and must be followed.
--
"The Council is the Magisterium of the Church," His Holiness said. "Either you are with the Church and therefore you follow the Council, and if you do not follow the Council or you interpret it in your own way, at your own will, you are not with the Church. We must be demanding and strict on this point."
--
Naturally, the Holy Father did not have to clarify which council he was referring to: of the 21 ecumenical councils recognized by the Church, one would say that only the last one, the Second Vatican Council, which did not proclaim any dogma or rectify any erroneous doctrine, has any weight or importance in the Church today. In the same way that one would sometimes say, in the light of what many enthusiastic 'renovators' comment, that Francis is not one among 264 and counting, but the only and definitive one.
--
As for that prohibition to "interpret in your own way, at your will" that Council par excellence, completely opportune, it seems to ignore that the free interpretation, the capricious, multiform, ad libitum, interpretation of the Council has been more the norm than the exception, the essential axis of that "spirit of the Council" that has given rise to all kinds of abuses to which Rome has rarely put a stop.
--
But we are in the 21st century, and today we know better than in other times that the message is not only, perhaps not even mainly, in the literalness of what is said, but in the emphases, the silences, the gestures, the condemnations, the promotions, the dissolutions, the supports, the omissions....
--
And since in our Church we are not asked to give up thinking or to deny what is right under our noses, in the sight of all, it becomes evident that there are indeed free and very personal interpretations of the council that do not coincide with the official one and, nevertheless, do not bring anathemas, canonical penalties or suspensions, but often appointments, applause and honors.
--
What reality imposes, finally, is that [there is] not only one type of interpretation of the council, [but that must be considered valid] those that precisely take into account all the previous ones and the doctrine of the Popes predecessors of Francis, the one that deserves an implacable and immediate response of censure.
--
It is therefore especially significant that the Holy Father, speaking to catechists, refers to the last ecumenical council as "the Council" and does not seem equally compelled to uphold and follow all the others. The Catholic Church was not born, after all, in 1965.>>
--
----
Remember that the sensus fidei of the sheep (of which Father Olivera Ravasi speaks in part III of the transcription I made) implies that ALL the faithful believe the same thing and AGREE WITH WHAT THE CHURCH HAS ALWAYS TEACHED, otherwise those sheep do not have "sensus fidei". And how would they ask the sheep now? By electronic means, which are handled at will by those who prepare them. An example: An emigrant from Venezuela says: in Venezuela democracy ended when voting machines began to be used. In the United States something similar is happening.
--
SATANISM IN THE SEMINARS, we need holy priests according to the true Catholic Religion.
A priest said that we are "incarnated spiritual beings".
I told him that we are bits of flesh where God inspired the soul, that we did not live from before conception, but he answered me that (1) God had thought us before we existed.
--
I told him that creation would also have been thought but it is material.
He told me that creation also and that (2) St. Paul said that creation groans in labor pains.
--
I told him that frogs (for example) when they die cease to exist and he said: (3)--yes, in principle, but....
I asked him which current he was from and he told me that this was the theology of the Catholic Church.
----------------
(1) The fact that God has thought us from eternity does not mean that we exist from eternity. God in the OT said that if He thought to send misfortunes upon a people and that people repented of their sins and did penance, that He did not send punishment. That means that what He thinks does not necessarily make it concrete. To think and to create are two separate things. He thought us, but he creates us at the moment of conception.
--
--
(2) The creation suffers for the sins of men, until the new man is born, St. Paul says in Romans 8, 22: "for we know that the whole creation groans and travails in birth until the present time", but that simply means that because of our sins the animals and even the vegetables suffer (the trees before dying make a characteristic sound, the animals suffer what they did not suffer in paradise). When humans behave well (when the saints remain at the second coming of Christ, that is when the new man is born, that is to say that all will be saints and not the old man of sin) the animals will not attack each other but, for example, the lions will eat straw together with the cattle.
--
--
If we think that animals are spiritual beings that existed before they were born and that have a transcendent life after they die, we would be passing to the animist theory that Bergoglio wanted to introduce in the Church with the synod of Panamazonia (to put in the animal and spiritual idols of the indigenous people, which even most of them no longer believe in).
--
If we say that the earth groans in a literal sense, we would be passing to the theory of the earth as a living being with self-consciousness that reacts rationally: the so much mentioned Gaia (that Bergoglio and his followers try to introduce in the Religion) or the most well-known feminine idol "Pachamama" and from there to "mother god" (that some women preach in the street of my neighborhood and some feminists) there is a step.
--
(3) There he was speechless, he had to recognize that it is the faith of the Church. But it seems that he thinks they are going to change it because he said that "in principle."
--
-
It is horrible where we human beings get to when we have no information of the true faith. We cannot interpret St. Paul or St. Augustine or anyone else as we see fit. And worse, not having Catholic formation, people are educated by TV and believe as in that cartoon movie that "All dogs go to heaven". Once I saw a cartoon like the Simpsons, but more crude, where children were asking their teacher at school if cats go to heaven. The teacher thought out loud: ...hum... all dogs go to heaven... she replied that, so, cats do not. With all these heresies what they are doing is simply preparing faster the incarnation of the devil (a spiritual being that is going to incarnate) because if we would abandon the true faith and believe in heresies and paganism, God would leave us in the hands of our enemy. -- The satanists infiltrated in the Church will think that if they help the devil to incarnate faster, they will receive part of the power he has and that they will conquer heaven.It is the same as the communist deception (communism and its herald, socialism, are satanism) where all revolutionaries were promised to be czars... and ended up slaves. When Venezuela had Chavez, the Cubans told them not to vote for communism, to learn from what had happened to them, but the Venezuelans answered them that Venezuela is not like Cuba, that Venezuela has oil and gold... and the gold and oil ended up being taken by Russia and China and Iran... and they were left worse off than in Cuba. Perhaps they thought that in Venezuela there was too much wealth for everyone to be a potentate... and they ended up in a kind of hell. It is the same thing that happens in relation to man and the devil. The devil would not have any power on earth if man (the administrator of the earth) did not give it to him, but they give it to him with their venial and mortal sins and if they die on that path they end up in hell forever. It's the same scheme repeated and repeated...
Part V
Of the video of priest Javier Olivera Ravasi on the Synod on synodality
[starts at minute 35:51]
He reads: What theological justification is given for the need for this listening? Well, you know that in many parishes...or in a few perhaps, we would have to see the percentage, consultations have been made...e.g. "what do you think" "what are the topics to be discussed at the synod"... [he reads]: What theological justification is given for the need for listening? Pope Francis, the organizers of the synod, the preparatory documents insist (he quotes) that the totality of the faithful who have the anointing of the Holy Spirit (by Baptism), cannot err in the Faith, that famous "infallible in credendo", this is the approach at the level of principles, given that all the faithful, I say "all the baptized", although we are going to see that even people who are not even baptized have signed up, the baptized have the Holy Spirit, even if we are not faithful many times [unclear words] supposedly we should not err, well. We must clarify in the background that not everyone has been asked [I did not answer any questions because I knew the root was bad, I simply wrote the prayer in reparation for the blasphemies] [he reads] "How then to know when the beliefs of the faithful are really infallible?", the question of the doctors, "the only sure method" (the answer) is to apply the rule of St. Vincent de Lerins, the one we said before: "that which has always been believed, everywhere and by all, is infallible" [and he reads it in Latin], that is: the traditional doctrine of the Church. The sensus fiei, fidelium in the sense that the faith of the faithful, not what the laity or priests may think at a given moment, but the consensus among the bishops and to the last of the faithful throughout the world over the centuries. Here [unclear words]. [he reads] Is it true that the promoters of the synod insist that special attention be given to the voice of marginalized minorities? [This is also found in the instrumentus Laboris, as we said at the beginning. The Vademecun, there is a Vademecum also about the synod, insists (he quotes) that it is "important that we make every effort to listen to the voices of all, especially the marginalized." And it is very good to listen to the voices of the marginalized. Those who feel marginalized, who "perceive themselves as self-marginalized," outside the Church. I can listen to them. But you're not going to listen to someone who feels outside the Church to tell him, "Well, from now on we accept you," this is the closest thing to a club! I'm supporter of Boca Juniors [Argentina's soccer team], for example. I am not a member of Boca, but if I wanted to be a member of Boca Juniors, they would tell me: Father, you have to pay a fee, you have to come dressed in a blue, yellow and blue shirt (the Boca Juniors shirt), if you pay for a stall or a popular one you will have to go this way or that way. These are the club's rules, let's say I can't say "now I want the club to be the way I want" -"set up a separate club if you want". And that's it.
--
[He reads] Answers should not only highlight the positive experiences, but also bring out the challenging and negative experiences. In fact sometimes the perspective of what we might call a "minority input" can constitute a [and he grimaces in disrepute] "prophetic witness" to what God wants to say to the Church [this resembles the infamous Synod of Pan-Amazonia which thanks God came to nothing, there we were asked to listen to the voices of tribal paganism]. This was in this Vademecum [shows cover, min. 39:32] [reads] what would be these challenging and negative experiences whose [makes quotation mark with hands] "prophetic witness" were picked up in diocesan consultations? When all over the world these consultations are supposedly held... the document for the continental stage of the synod lists some, for example: [reads] among those who ask for a more incisive dialogue and a more welcoming space we find those who for various reasons feel a certain tension between belonging to the Church and their own affective relationships, [he quotes] for example, here are the [and makes a quotation mark with his fingers] marginalized, the divorced and remarried, single parents, those who live in a polygamous marriage, lgtbq people [q means pederasty, an zoophylia and necrophylia! They want to include pedophiles, necrophiliacs and zoophiles in the Church!!!!] What does this mean? That supposedly those who feel [makes the sign of quotation marks with fingers] marginalized, already baptized but who feel... who got married for the second time... who have homosexual tendencies who do not live in chastity but want to be sexually active, or... "well, I am married but I have 5 women or 5 men"... polygamy or polyandry, right? Or: "I want to be accepted as I am because that's who I am. Well, look: -Do you want to be a member of Boca or do you want to be a member of River? [Boca Juniors' traditional rival team] -Go to River. In short.
[41] It would therefore be a matter of including in the Church these minorities, as the document says [makes the sign of quotation marks with his fingers] marginalized. [This has been reflected in the consultations at the continental level. Almost all the concluding documents of the continental stages of the synodal journey, called continental syntheses, explicitly mention that they took special care to consult these marginalized minorities. For example we read in the South American synthesis (he quotes) "in the continental assembly as in our national reports there was a deep desire for greater inclusion and welcome within the Church. They include women, young immigrants, radical or linguistic minorities, lgtbiq+ persons, divorced persons who have remarried without an annulment and those with different degrees of physical or mental abilities [words unclear]. In other words, these minorities have been consulted. What do you think? Do you agree with the Church [42:04] Do you agree with the Church [42:04] telling you that because you are living an affective, sexually active life in a homosexual degree the Church does not allow you to receive Communion or says... does not want to bless you [imitating a dialogue] -no I do not agree because I want to be included... Nothing happens, you are included by Baptism in any case, but you have to convert... Do you have this disordered tendency towards sodomy? Well, you have to convert and live chastely. Did you get married in the Church? Did your marriage go badly? Was your marriage valid? And did you separate because your wife left you, your husband left you? Well, you have to take that burden, that cross and not say: well, it's okay, go ahead. Otherwise, I'm doing wrong.
--
What does the document on the continental stage say about the ordination of women? It states that many women feel sad that their contributions and charisms are not always valued, finally it says that many women demand the female diaconate and the possibility for women to preach. [He reads] "a significant step was taken by Pope Francis himself in April when for the first time in history the Pope gave women the power to vote in the synod that ended with up to 25% of participants being lay people (as we said before)". Pope Francis himself said that women cannot be priests, if not in any case become a parallel church. [He shows a video where the antipope speaks:] "But we cannot go beyond the revelation and the dogmatic explanations. We are Catholics, eh? If someone wants to make another church, he is free". Well, but here we have insisted on this topic. Are these topics really new? [unclear words] something similar was tried with the Pastoral Council of the Netherlands but it worked badly, this works badly. He reads: is radical inclusion the key to understanding the next synod? Yes, this Vademecum, which we talked about to understand the synod states, he quotes: Genuine efforts must be made to ensure the inclusion of those who are on the margins or feel excluded. There is a lot of talk here about inclusion, inclusion, inclusion.
--
He reads: is radical inclusion the key to understanding the upcoming synod? Yes, this Vademecum, which we talked about to understand the synod states, [he quotes]: Genuine efforts must be made to ensure the inclusion of those who are on the margins or feel excluded. There is a lot of talk here about inclusion, inclusion, inclusion. He reads: "Can this inclusion be seen as the continuation of the church of the poor proposed by liberation theology?" The authors say. There is much talk about the church for the wounded and broken... there are often many marginalized people also in the church, in several calls it is reminded that according to the spirit of Jesus we must be inclusive with the poor, lgbt communities and companionship, couples in second union, priests who want to return to the church in their new situation, what does this mean? A priest, like me, Father Javier, God forbid, leaves the ministry, gets together with a woman but then wants to come back, because of course... well, no: "you made a mistake, make your life, ask for a dispensation, get married in the church, keep your soul". [And remember that we must not be inclusive with sins, Jesus does not want homosexuals or adulterers in His Church, remember that not only we must not be fornicators but we must not even look at others with lasciviousness, Jesus does not want a Church of filth but of purity].
--
Here is the point: have the faithful been consulted? In theory, in theory, the synodal process should consult all the people of God. This is the infallibility "in credendo" that we said at the beginning. It is generally about progressive minorities, says the text, already devoted to the struggle for the reform of the Church because we will see that the percentage was minimal of the people who have been consulted. Read: "the French bishops' conference reported that 150,000 people had mobilized to contribute to the reflection of the synod 2023 on synodality. This represents only 3.47% of the faithful who go to Mass on Sundays, or 0.35% of all Catholics in France. In other words: 0.35% of baptized Catholics in France were consulted on the subject of the synod. A document of the national synod of the Catholic Church in Spain states: in this shared journey 14,000 synodal groups have participated in Spain involving more than 215,000 people including religious, this represents only 7.7% of the faithful who go to Mass on Sundays, or 0.77% of Spanish Catholics. In other words: that "credendo inflalibility" of all the faithful people: 0.77 ...Spain. These figures are similar in almost all countries, let's see: in Austria 1.04% of Catholics participated, in Belgium 0.54% of Catholics, in Ireland 1.13% of Catholics, in England 0.79% of Catholics, in Latin America, we, in Latin America: 0.21% of Catholics. Therefore, the vast majority of us have not even been consulted on these issues. In Poland, also Catholic, the participation was 0.58% of Catholics. What am I getting at with all this? It is that the faithful people, who have that "infallibility in credendo", the faithful people in general did not even know about it, did not even know about it. This is the reason why I said that we have to make a program to show at least what is going on, what is happening. Why? Because if not, when the time comes, the information will come down through the media, through television, through whatever, that from one day to the next... and we know that the Church is in crisis, that it has always been in crisis since Judas Iscariot onwards, but let us be very clear, let us weigh things, let us not be taken for a ride. Today it is necessary to be very well informed about so many things, not to be scandalized [BE CLEAR ABOUT THIS, DO NOT LOSE YOUR CALM BECAUSE OF SCANDALS BUT DO A LOT OF SACRIFICE AND PENANCE TO LIGHTEN THE CROSS OF JESUS] but to know how to discriminate the wheat from the tares, the truth from the lie, the falsehood from the error. [48:40]
--
What do these figures mean? Based on these figures, which, as we said, are consistent worldwide, we can affirm that the general synod on synodality arouses very little interest among the faithful, in fact it has aroused very little interest, which is why I say that many of us had no idea. He reads: in any case, the meager response of the faithful to the synod's surveys raises a crucial question that in itself could invalidate the synod at its root. That is to say: "can we speak of "consulting the people of God" or only small minorities? who are these minorities? who is moving them?" In many cases they will have been simple people who responded, but in other cases, I have no doubt, they must have been people who are ideologized and who responded to things they wanted to hear, rather. He reads: What is the main problem of the Church according to the promoters of the synod? According to the promoters of the synod, the main problem would be clericalism, as we said before, that is, its hierarchical structures that divide it between clergy and laity, between [and it says it in Latin] the teaching Church and the disciple Church, the Church that receives the teaching. [The Jew-Nazi-Gypsy-Masons who have crept into the whole structure of the church now want anyone to preach whatever comes out of his ass, as many deacons (and in my parish: women) are already doing in the "celebrations of the word", if that prospered, it would be very difficult to find Christ in the Church. They did not study deeply, they go and talk about themselves, their experiences and what is dictated to them by the one-world planners]
--
He reads: "What would be the remedy to clericalism? The remedy to clericalism would be the implementation of co-responsibility through the recognition of the equal dignity of all the baptized and the value of the "charisms and lay mysteries" " Then the bishop, the priest and the normal lay person would be equally responsible, and as we are all Church... let's say, that famous movement that was born in Germany: We are all Church, that super progressive movement, which was born at the beginning of 2000 or the end of the 90's, they were looking for that: a Church where there was no hierarchical structure: Jesus Christ, head of the Church, the Church the mystical body and that the doctrine is taught through the pastors. No, from now on, some have proposed a democratic church, where we vote, "...well, the signs of the times are changing, then we change the doctrine". But, just a moment: the Church is not the owner of the Truth, it is the administrator of the Truth, which is Jesus Christ Our Lord.
[min 51:21 of 1:19:49].
--
PART VI
[55:00]
[He reads:] "Is the German synodal process, from which much inspiration is drawn, or from which some want to draw inspiration for this topic (the current synodality), different from the universal synod? Formally yes, in the sense that it is the synodal church of Germany, autonomous and parallel to the universal synodal process. In reality the German synodal path, the Weg, the way is considered in the declared intentions of its main protagonists, as we will see below, almost like a locomotive that will move the wagons in the world synodal process inaugurated in 2015." "Does that German synodal path entail a cultural paradigm shift in the Church? Yes, I quote this Georg Batzing Bishop of Edinburgh [words unclear] 'Yes, the synod must lead to a cultural paradigm shift to a change in the praxis of the Church.'
--
[I can imagine what change: the acceptance of pedophilia and other barbarities that are forbidden by the Church and by the conscience that God put in every human being. A UN individual made a report suggesting that pedophilia be de facto approved as was done with abortion (in Spain and Argentina, for example, it is unconstitutional, but the laws approved it). << A disturbing new report from the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) adds to growing concerns about global leaders pushing to normalize pedophilia.
The report “The 8 March Principles for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Criminal Law Proscribing Conduct Associated with Sex, Reproduction, Drug Use, HIV, Homelessness and Poverty” on the UNAIDS website offers legal guidance on issues related to sex, including involving children under age 18.
Without any discussion about what the age of consent should be, the report suggests minors can consent to having sex with an adult…. … In other words, Live Action News writer Cassy Fiano-Chesser pointed out “the report calls for sex between adults and minors to be decriminalized, so long as the minors ‘consent’ … Minors, of course, cannot truly consent to sex with an adult — something these so-called experts should know. However, the report portrays the matter as an issue of rights and acceptance.”>>
REMEMBER THAT THE ANTIPOPE WANTS THE UN TO RULE THE WORLD] Of course, they are not going to tell you, these who are the advanced, I think they call themselves "the advanced", they are not going to tell you we have to change the morals of the Church, the faith of the Church... they are always going to talk about "pastoralism", "praxis", ... [with irony:] we have to adapt ourselves to the world. In reality what Jesus was saying to us is: you are the salt of the earth, the light of the world. It is not the Church that has to adapt itself to the world, but rather the world that has to adapt itself to the principles of the Church. The principles of the Church mean the principles of Jesus Christ our Lord.
--
[he reads:] "In other words, the German synodal path will have to change not only accidental elements but its very foundations. Those will have to be destroyed, only then can we build a new church. This sounds radical and in reality it is." Responds the president of the German Catholic Youth Federation, a certain Gregor Podschun. [They hate the Church so much that they want to destroy it from its foundations, but they will not be able to destroy the foundations because the foundation is Jesus Christ himself! And the Church was founded in perfect form. They already made a "new church" with Luther that fell into a thousand pieces because it was a branch that went off the vine and rotted. I read that among protestants the problema of pedophilia is worst tan in the Church, but they keep silence. Homosexuals are the worst predators of children that exist, but their atrocities are kept in silence.]
--
[he reads:] "What solutions does the German synodal path propose?" This one that is like a locomotive as some say here. "to overcome the prevailing clericalism [ such satanists hate priests]" in the Church", to change its hierarchical structure and its morals, the promoters propose:
1. The participation of the laity in the appointment of bishops and the democratization of the structures of the Church. [It can NOT be democratized because it is the KINGDOM OF CHRIST.]
2. The overcoming of the obligation of celibacy for priests.
3. (This is all in the German synodal path that some are, it seems, wanting to bring into this topic) The admission to holy orders of homosexual persons. It is NOT POSSIBLE because dogs go to hell, they cannot be priests.
4. The opening of the priestly ministry to women (we already said that this is defined [It is defined by the Magisterium of the Church that women cannot receive Holy Orders.]). [JESUS CHOSE A JUDAS ISCARIOT BEFORE HIS MOTHER TO BE A PRIEST OR BISHOP. It is necessary to follow the Holy Tradition of the Church, He is Man and wants only duly ordained men to represent Him].
5. The revaluation of homosexuality and acceptance of same-sex unions.
6. The condonation [remission, commutation] of the Church's sexual morality.
[58:14]
It is as a priest friend of mine said: as if for them the Commandments were from the waist down, not from the waist up. At the very end of the matter, if one wants to consider it here, they are the 'sexual signs of the times'. Since many believe that the Catholic morality of the Church is based only on the 6th and 9th commandments that legislate from the waist down and forget the rest, those who raise these things want to try to make an ecclesial change, a change of the Church, to justify their disordered desires. This is found in the Apostle Paul's letter to the Romans, chapter 1 verse 28, that Paul says (with much irony) that because they did not recognize God in creation, God abandoned them to their disordered desires. [59:03]
--
[Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to St. Matthew 6:19-21
Do not store up treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy them and where thieves break through walls and steal; but store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys them and where thieves do not break through walls and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also."
--
And it turns out that people accumulate branded clothes (or worse: tight-fitting, women in pants, with exaggerated necklines) instead of accumulating humility. Or they accumulate hours on electronic games or social networks instead of accumulating rosaries on their knees for the peace of the world and the conversion of sinners, etc.
--
"Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to St. Matthew 6, 22-23.
The lamp of the body is the eye. If therefore your eye is good, your whole body will be enlightened, but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be darkened. If then the light in you is darkness, the darkness itself whow great shall it be?"
--
The lamp receives electricity or, in Jesus' time, a little flame of fire to light the oil. Our spiritual lamp receives the light of God but if we receive things like TV, it stains the soul and the soul has no more light. And people without light cannot meditate on God, and then they do not even realize what their mission in this world is... and then the world is darker because the light of that person is missing. He neither has light inside nor does he collaborate so that there is light in the world. Now it is so dark that they do not distinguish between a mentally ill person (homosexual) and a normal person, they think that it is the same or that the unhappy homosexual is more evolved. They do not distinguish between a tumor and a child in gestation, they abort a creature that God, their Creator Father, sent with a mission to the world.
--
They do not distinguish between a hormoned man and a woman. They do not distinguish between a good Catholic, believing and pious and themselves, who come to the Church to destroy, kill and steal, who send their children to catechesis for their first Communion and do not send them to Mass, they make their first Communion sacrilegious, hate us, lie, steal, kill Jesus Christ on purpose, betray all the 10 Commandments because they envy the Church. They do not distinguish between a terminally ill person whose time is precious to be saved and thtat gives us merits for heaven to take care of him, from an appliance that is unplugged and goodbye. They do not distinguish between an adult and a child (who must remain innocent and grow in wisdom), they promote gender ideology in classrooms and promote pederasty. Messianic Jews and Masonic Jews (both groups are condemned, because if they do not believe that Jesus is God, they cannot enter Heaven) come to the Church to make sacrilegious communions, they envy the goods of the Church, they steal, etc. all against the 10 commandments... and they think of themselves that they are the superior ones, those who have the true religion but they serve the devil. The world went after satan and will only reap pain and death, because the devil hates us and is a murderer.
--
The lamp receives its power of illumination from an external source (electricity now and fire at the time of Jesus) if instead of receiving from God's source we receive evil light from the world, our soul is stained and we are left in darkness. The healthy eye does not see others with anger, rancor, envy, much less lasciviousness, nor does it see where chastity forbids it.
--
Lest God destroy a world that is becoming the den of all abominable sins, the Church must return to Holy Tradition, and homosexuality and abortion must be eradicated from this civilization. The darkness now is great because most are not fulfilling their mission. They seek money and pleasure. Understand:
--
"Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to St. Matthew 6, 24.
No one can be the slave of two masters, for either he will hate the one and have love for the other, or else he will adhere to the first and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.
--
You cannot try to have more light from God, more good works to present to Him, and at the same time try to accumulate more money. If you do not choose for yourself, life will lead you to one side or the other. You will always follow one path or the other].
--
Part VII of the video "The Synod of Synodality" by priest Javier Olivera Ravasi, on his You Tube account: QNTLC
--
[Starts at minute 59:03].
This is found in the Apostle Paul's letter to the Romans, chapter 1 verse 28, which Paul says (with much irony) that because they did not recognize God in creation, God abandoned them to their disordered desires. Then he joined man with man, woman... and now they want to justify, as they turned away from God, as they do not recognize the True God, God abandoned them to their most disordered and unnatural passions, by the way. And now they want to justify them...
--
We go on a little longer, it's not long now... He reads: "What do the promoters of the German synod intend to do with regard to the government of the Church?" I reiterate, those who pretend to be ahead of the curve with all this. "the promoters propose a decostruction of the hierarchical structures of the Church that will bring about profound changes in its system of authority", "the authority of the bishops will be limited by councils of the laity who will have decision-making power." [This is barbaric because the power of the bishops is given by God, the laity cannot pretend to place themselves above the bishops or any consecrated or ordained person.] This seems crazy, in many of our countries, Hispanic countries, it seems crazy, it has been happening for decades in Germany and Holland.
--
[And the atrocities that Germany is doing, not only the pseudo synod but the creation of Frankenstein in incubators during the whole gestation, they are thinking of MAKING 30,000 Frankenstein a year and in Holland, they are on the way to death:
<<Currently, euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands for children over the age of 12. The government of the Netherlands has approved plans that would allow terminally ill children between the ages of one and 12 to be euthanized.
Last Tuesday, Dutch Health Minister Hugo de Jonge said that this reform would prevent children from suffering "unbearable and hopeless suffering".
Currently, euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands for children over 12 years of age under mandatory consent of the patient and their parents.
News item:
- Noa Pothoven, the 17-year-old who requested euthanasia in the Netherlands for suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, dies.
It is also allowed in infants under one year of age with parental consent.>>
Death a la carte, for depression, when there are antidepressant treatments, now they plan to have euthanasia for all those who consider that they have fulfilled their life, even if they are not sick, predators see a weak victim and wrap it in their death plans. Remember that the devil is a murderer from the beginning. The lgtbiq and other satanists dress up like sheep, false light (rights, inclusion, etc.) and will attack the weakest: people with difficulties, children ... in Spain it is terrible that they planned a law (or is already in force) in which they want children with down syndrome to go to regular schools, there they will feel unhappy, they will not understand anything and will give them anguish and will want to commit suicide (encouraged by bad teachers or bad classmates) and from there to suicide for all children is a step.
Here are some paragraphs from an article published by CatholicNewsAgencie on April 8, 2024:
<<A study by researchers in the Netherlands found that nearly two-thirds of children who had wished they belonged to the opposite sex in adolescence ended up feeling comfortable with their biological sex in early adulthood.
The 15-year study, conducted by researchers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, tracked the gender unhappiness rates of 2,772 study participants from age 11 to 26.
"Gender nonconformity, although relatively common during early adolescence, generally declines with age and appears to be associated with poorer self-concept and mental health throughout development," the researchers explained in a synopsis of the report.
--
[I think it's like that woman who doesn't feel satisfied with her marriage, and thinks her nose is the problem, and she has surgery after surgery, kids fantasize about being the other sex when their internal problem is something else and they can't identify it.]
--
In the United States and throughout Europe, the prescription of transgender drugs and the availability of sex change surgeries for minors has become a major topic of debate. Such prescriptions and procedures for minors are banned in nearly two dozen states, but remain legal in more than half of them.
Hasson expressed concern about counselors pressuring parents to provide their children with these life-altering drugs and procedures when all they need is time to feel more comfortable with their bodies.
[ promoters of sex change are rapacious wolves in the guise of "sheep": for children's rights, for an inclusive society, etc. but what they do is attack, kill the weakest of the herd, as any predator does. In this case children who know nothing about life and those who have psychological problems].
--
"Unfortunately, what our children are not given today is time: time to experience and get through the natural (sometimes painful) stages of pubertal growth, along with the assurance that they will eventually end up feeling comfortable in their own skin," Hasson said. "Instead, clinicians and gender counselors convince parents that their children are in crisis and need puberty blockers or other hormonal interventions. This is not true. What they really need is reassurance and time to mature."
Another recent study, published in Finland earlier this year, found that providing adolescents with transgender drugs or surgeries did not provide any statistically significant reduction in suicide deaths.
Rather, the study found that higher suicide rates appear to be rooted in the elevated rate of mental health comorbidities among youth who identify as trans>>
--
Some people are waking up from the criminal delusion of lgtbiq, let's protect the Church from their entering and remove all the freemasons who want to dynamite it from within.
Prayer and sacrifice, Our Lady of the Roses commands us at least]
--
I have been some time in Holland visiting some priest friends and they told me that not even they have the key to the parish, that there is a kind of parish council [the messianic Jews wanting to rot the Church make a kind of Sanhedrin] that manages ABSOLUTELY everything, and the priest ends up being a kind of employee of the laity. What if those lay people were, by the way: catholic, practicing, virtuous, holy, good, prudent... GOOD! I submit to any layman, but it is not so either.
Again [and he makes an inverted triangle with his fingers] the change of figure: the pyramid becomes inverted... the bases at the top, the authority at the bottom.
--
He reads: "Was there consensus for the formation of the council?" "the instrument for the participation of the laity will be the so-called synodal councils at the national, diocesan and parish levels." ...There was no consensus, some bishops were opposed to this kind of parliamentarism that is to be introduced in the Church. Even Cardinal Kasper himself, who was not on the conservative side, far from it, but quite the contrary, was scandalized. He said: "Synods cannot become permanent institutions. The tradition of the Church knows no synodal ecclesiastical government. A supreme synodal council as it is now proposed has no basis in the history of the construction of the Church. It would not be a renewal but an unprecedented innovation" Cardinal Kasper is saying this. We are quoting none other than Cardinal Kasper.
Then in a lucid interval perhaps, he said this.
--
Aspects of this topic, Pope Francis, no more and no less, said the following: "The synodal council would constitute a new structure of Church governance in Germany that seems to place itself above the authority of the German episcopal conference, going so far as to de facto replace it. We wish to make it clear that neither the synodal way nor any body established by it nor any episcopal conference has the competence to constitute the synodal council at the national, diocesan or parish level."
This was said in a letter by Pope Francis to the bishops of Germany, who overwhelmingly disregarded him, they are still going ahead with this issue.
--
He reads: "how does the topic of women's ordination relate to the theme of the synod?" I reiterate: many of these things that are found in the German synod have been raised for this synod of synodality, AND THEY WILL COME OUT, this is why the authors touch on these topics. He reads "women would be among those marginalized minorities, which it would be a matter of including in the life of the Church, for that they should be able to access the Sacrament of Holy Orders at all levels...[unclear words] we expect the Church to state clearly how we can imagine women as deacons or as priests based on the theological arguments discussed in the synodal forum..." This is all from Germany. Obviously we know that the magisterium of the Church does not allow the ordination of women, not because it wants to marginalize them but because the Holy Order of the Church is of divine institution, it is not of human institution [this is what he was referring to in point 4. of part VI when he said that the ordination of women is defined]. It may be of human institution e.g. whether a catechist can be a woman, whether consecrated virgins take the vows of obedience, chastity and poverty, or... [1:04].
--
[those who propose that women should be priests are feminists and feminism is satanism, when they started working outside the home, divorces began because they arrived home tired and stressed to do household things, children without clear maternal or paternal figures, developed sexual identity problems because they were educated by TV, even emotionally, which put the idol of the moment on them. Now the UN wants to approve pederasty (and it was already raised in the synod of synodality the incorporation of lgtbiq... gays are the biggest predators of children there are and the q are pedophiles, necrophiliacs and zoophiles). ]
--
He reads: "how does the issue of homosexuals come up with the theme of the synod of synodality? Answer: homosexuals and more broadly lgbt people would be another of these marginalized minorities to be included in the life of the Church" This is found in the document Instrumentus laboris. "we hope for changes towards a Church with gender equality" [God created two genders: male and female, the other are mental illnesses, or directly moral vices of mortal sins] "to carry out this inclusion would have to change, obviously, the moral doctrine of the Church What does it mean to include or not to include homosexuals? Perhaps no one has stated this thesis more clearly than Cardinal Robert McElroy [1:04], Archbishop of San Diego, USA. In a Jesuit magazine, called America, he stated that the synod should (he quotes) include those who are divorced and remarried without a declaration of nullity from the Church, members of the lgbt community and those who are civilly married but have not been married by the Church, this 'inclusion' would involve the reception of Holy Communion by persons who objectively live in public sin. I have proposed (this says Cardinal McElroy) that divorced and remarried Catholics or LGBT persons who are ardently seeking God's grace in their lives not be categorically excluded from the Eucharist." We completely agree with this. What does this mean? That if someone is divorced but remarried but lives in chastity as John Paul II has said I think in Familiaris Consortio if I'm not mistaken, or John Paul II or Benedict has taught in the last few decades as well? if a person has homosexual tendencies but does not perform the acts and repents if he did them, he can perfectly well have access to the sacrament of confession, the Eucharist, Confirmation, whatever [except Holy Orders, which is not for homosexuals even if they live in chastity, nor for women], but if I am not in the grace of God I cannot receive communion. Why? Because St. Paul says that you swallow your own condemnation.
--
[reads] "In order to include homosexuals, would it be necessary to change the moral doctrine of the Church? Yes, a preparatory document of the German Web states 'We are convinced that the reorientation of pastoral care will not be possible without a profound reform of the Church's sexual morality." They say it out loud. "In particular the teaching that considers sexual relations ethically legitimate only within the framework of a legitimate marriage and only in constant openness to procreation, has led to a widespread rupture of the magisterium with the faithful." Of course. [I do not see that there has been a rupture, I never saw anyone complaining, they simply leave the Church after First Communion because their parents do not go to Mass either but it is not because they are in illegitimate marriages but because they are not taught well about the Holy Religion, they do not learn to love it, it is that most of the priests are Messianic Jews and do not love the Catholic Religion, they do not transmit anything. So there are four old people who go to Mass, two young people and a tiny noisy minority of haters of the Religion. But where the Latin Mass is reintroduced, families are flourishing in attendance].
--
[He reads:] "Likewise we read in another document of the Weg" (the German way) "along the lines of this re-evaluation of homosexuality, among other things, paragraphs 2357-2359 and 2396 (homosexuality and chastity) of the Catechism [of the Catholic Church] should be revised (...) In the compendium of the catechism homosexual acts should be removed from the list of grave sins against chastity" They say it like this, unabashedly. "Their sexuality, realized even in sexual acts is not a sin that separates them from God." Let's do one thing, easier [with irony] let's tear out a couple of pages from the gospel, from the Old Testament and we'll be quiet, that's it, let's not make trouble for ourselves, let's tear out books from the Bible, as the Protestants did, who have an incomplete Bible, and we'll be quiet, it doesn't suit us.
--
[1:08]
[reads:] "Not otherwise is the opinion of Luxembourg Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich, general rapporteur of the synod, who has declared that the Church's doctrine on homosexual relations is 'false' and should therefore be changed." The source is found with this text. This opinion is shared by some episcopates and recently by some French bishops who asked the Pope that the Catechism of the Catholic Church be modified so that homosexual acts are not condemned as intrinsically disordered. [He reads:] "Are the promoters of the German synodal path the only ones asking for this 'inclusion' of homosexuals? No. As we saw almost all the conclusive documents of the continental stages of the synodal path (continental syntheses) explicitly mention the need to 'include' LGBT persons." Of course, faced with the impossibility of analogizing and marrying in sacramental marriage persons of the same sex, canonical subterfuges were sought. "For example, in 2022, the Flemish bishops (of Flanders) [also, from that area close to Holland and Germany, Luther was a total pervert and the fruit does not fall far from the tree] approved a rite of blessing homosexual couples that was then taken up by the German synodal path, the idea is not new, already in 2015, on the occasion of the synod on the family, German Catholics had proposed, (quote) a further development of liturgical formulas, in particular, blessings of same-sex couples, new divorced couples, and for important decisions in family life" Did the Vatican approve this? Noo, no way, it did not approve this, it is not approved, on the contrary, there was a response, a responso, it is called, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to a Dubiun (a Dubiun means a doubt that they wrote to the Vatican to ask about whether or not blessings of same-sex couples was okay), and the Vatican responded: "It is not licit ( in the year '21) to impart a blessing to relationships or to couples, even stable ones, that involve sexual praxis outside of marriage (that is, outside of the indissoluble union of a man and a woman, open, by themselves, to the transmission of life)"
--
[reads:] "What is the family according to the Doctrine of the Church? A man and a woman, united in marriage" But although it is not possible then to speak of family among homosexuals, then they are going to look for other words for example although sometimes they speak of 'marriage' in the documents of the German synodal path, the most common is to speak of Partner-schagtfsformen (forms of couples, different forms of family, different forms of couple) that would be an inclusive form, that is, non-discriminatory [1:10]. Some ecclesial authorities turn out to perplex you, the authors say.
--
He reads: In an interview with the Croatian publication Glas Koncila, Cardinal Kollerich (the rapporteur I believe of the synod) questioned St. John Paul II's magisterium on the ordination of women. Asked if the situation can change he said: yes, in time it can change. Asked by a reporter if it is an infallible doctrine of the Church he replied: "I'm not sure it can be called infallible, probably not" [gesture of astonishment and repulsion]. He further condemns the doctrine of the Church's catechism that calls homosexual persons to chastity. I quote: calling these people to chastity is like speaking to them in Egyptian. [More gestures of astonishment and repulsion]. Our Lord did not speak in Egyptian but He spoke plainly.
--
The preceding pages were written based on the documents relating to the Synod of Synodality prior to the publications of the instrumentum laboris presented in Rome in July 2023. The authors' question is, does the instrumentum laboris change anything fundamental about what is said in this study? It seems to us that no, it only confirms the direction that this process has been taking for years. [At minute 1:12 he shows the cover of the instrumentum laboris. And now he shows the cover of The Synodal Process, a Pandora's box, 100 questions and 100 answers and says: ] This book still causes a lot of repercussion in many media, a book, I reiterate, that we quoted at the beginning, with a very good tone, it is not something aggressive, in the sense of unsubstantiated. Each page, as you could see, is substantiated at the foot of the page, it is not talking about crazy things.
--
And then he was asked at the time on the Holy Father's return to Mongolia, a journalist asked him this question to his face... there is a book with the prologue by Cardinal Burke saying this... [and he plays the video with the antipope's answer] Video: "You have spoken about the topic of the synod and we all agree with you that this synod arouses much curiosity and much interest. But unfortunately it arouses a lot of criticism. I would like to refer to a book, with the prologue of Cardinal Burke who says that it is Pandora's box, that is, the box from which all the calamities will come to the Church. What do you think of this position and do you think it will be a position overcome by reality or will it condition the synod?" Bergoglio: I don't know if I told you before, once I called a Carmel: - and how are the sisters, mother? And the prioress answered me, and at the end she said to me: - "But Holiness - a non-Italian monastery, eh? - "But Holiness, we are afraid about the synod" - But what's going on? Do you want to send an sister to the synod? I said jokingly - No, we are afraid that it will change the DOCTRINE".
And this is what you say. There is this idea, but if you go further to the roots of these ideas you will find ideology. Always when in the Church they want to take away the way of communion. It is always ideology that divides. And they accuse the Church of this or that, but they never accuse Her of that which is true: sinful [and based on that the antipope wants to make a breeding ground for all the vices and sins within the Church, who is Holy and sinful, but a sinner who wants to live in holiness]
they never say that it is sinful. They defend a "DOCTRINE" in quotation marks, which is a doctrine... like distilled water, which does not taste of anything... [obviously, distilled water and pure water have neither color nor taste, nor smell, but that is why it is pure water, the antipope wants, I told you, a breeding ground of shit]
and that it is not the true Catholic doctrine, which is in the Creed and that many times, the true Catholic doctrine scandalizes [NO, GOD DOES NOT SCANDALIZE, the sin is that some are scandalized of Him]
as scandalizes the idea that God became flesh, that God became man. That the Virgin preserved Her virginity. This scandalizes. Catholic doctrine sometimes scandalizes. The ideologies are all distilled and never scandalize [all liar the antipope because the ideology of gender does scandalize good people, and it is normal that we are scandalized by the brutal sin. But we are not scandalized by God, we believe in Him, we love Him, we obey Him and we hope in Him.
--
S. Matthew 11:6
And blessed is he who is not scandalized in Me
--
The antipope is changing things, he intends to lead the Church on the road to hell and not to Heaven, as the prophet Isaiah said: woe to those who call good evil and evil good, who make light darkness and darkness light.
--
Isaiah 5:20-25
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who turn darkness into light, and light into darkness; who turn bitter into sweet, and sweet into bitter! Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes, and think themselves wise, woe to those who are bold in drinking wine, and champions in mixing liquors, who by bribery declare the guilty innocent, and take away the reason of the just!
--
And there are rumors ( June, 2024) that the antipope is yet to strike another blow at the Latin Mass]
--
As we can see, even the journalists have asked him that there is a certain perpelijad [1:16], obviously how can one not be perplexed before a lot of things and barbarities that are being said and commented on. And then one says: let's see, ideology is always bad. Ideology is a closed system of thought independent of reality and must be fought in all areas. But ideology is one thing and true doctrine is another thing, someone who wants to impose a morality, a faith different from the one that Our Lord has taught us or that the Church has always wanted to transmit..., the reality of ideology is what those who want to impose from outside, or different ones. That is why it seems interesting to us to do this program, commenting on these things, because, I repeat, now in the month of October 2023 will be the first stage of the synod of synodality and one is going to be bombarded by many things and it will be necessary to sift and discern this type of comments that appear or that will surely appear and also to realize the following, this is very important: Paul in the letter to the Galatians, chapter one, verse eight, says: "If we or an angel from Heaven preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed" (and he repeats) "as we have said before and now I repeat to you: if anyone preaches to you a gospel different from the one you have received, let him be accursed."
--
So, not to be afraid, to keep the same faith... as I always say: I want to die in the faith that my grandparents transmitted to me, I want to die in the faith of my parents, I want to die for the faith that is found in the Sacred Scriptures, that is found in the Gospels, in Tradition, in the perennial and millennial Gospel of the Church, in the catechism if we want, simply that. To be attentive, then, to open our eyes, not to be scandalized, the faithful people have in credendo that infallibility as it happened, as we said before, in the time of the Arians that many clerics and bishops disagreed with the doctrine of the Church and it was the faithful people who came out triumphant with a couple of bishops to affirm the dogma of the Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, True God made Man.
To be attentive, to lift up your eyes, to lift up your eyes [and directs his eyes to Heaven] . As Our Lord says, when you hear these kinds of things, these kinds of strange propositions, you should not listen to them and in any case feel joyful because it is a grace to be still standing, it is a grace to fight, it is a grace to keep us attentive and diligent militants in our life of faith and grace.
May God bless you very much, I ask you to pray for me and as always: "don't let them tell it to you" [the name of his You Tube channel. End of video].