[TRANSCRIPT AND TRANSLATION. From: A millennial priest. – Video from 3 months ago, that's approx. May 2026. And that I uploaded it to Facebook at the end of June 2026.]
YOU DESERVE TO KNOW THIS from the PRIESTLY SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X. Father Byron clarifies.
[Perhaps this introduction is not clear to you, but after these first 4 paragraphs, the greeting begins and he speaks very clearly.]
--
After talking to some members of the Priestly Society of St. Pius X, by the way, I tried to talk to priests but up to date I have not been able to, so after talking to lay people of the fraternity I realized that... let's put it like this: I have noticed that many of them, we are not going to say many, but some of them do not know what the Fraternity really thinks of the Catholic Church, let's say like this, the extended, the broad, the Roman one... they don't really know.
--
So much so, that when the Society considers my Mass, my Holy Mass... that I celebrate it with so much love!... my priesthood... They probably consider it, with an "active" doubt, positive doubt... they consider it probably invalid... the priesthood and probably the Holy Mass. They have told me: "but no, you are a priest". But I've told them that's not what they think. They think that most likely, or let's put it like this: there is probably a doubt (to put it more mildly) there is a doubt that I am a priest and that the Mass that I celebrate really has the sacrificial value of what is given in the Eucharistic Sacrament, that is: the Holy Mass… that is not valid.
--
They should not call me: Priest. Or in any case, [they should] say "possibly a priest" but they freely assure me that I am [a priest]. This is not in accordance with what they think.
--
We are going to see here a list of points that provide clarity to this situation, for those who attend the Society from time to time, they must know ... because unfortunately there is a great barrier that has been built... Because they believe, basically, that we are another religion. Is this understood? Another religion. At least that is what we are going to see from the official texts themselves, official sites, from the Society.
--
Hello, Hello, dear young people, dear brothers, I hope you are doing very, very well. Father Byron greets you here.
--
I do this to provide clarity regarding the situation that has been occurring in recent days, weeks.
Today I want to speak clearly but also fairly about a sensitive issue. What does the Priestly Society of St. Pius X really believe about the Roman Catholic Church, let's say, currently, right? That they believe that we are drifting... or what they believe about the post-synodal Church.
--
I am not talking here about subjective intentions. Watch out for this... the very good and healthy intentions of the faithful who go to their chapels or oratories. Many go there really seeking reverence, recollection, serious liturgy, and pure doctrinal preaching.
--
But it is one thing to love liturgical tradition, to love doctrine, and quite another to love a vision of the Church that ends up presenting the visible Church as doctrinally suspect, liturgically ambiguous, invalid, sacramentally doubtful. And I am not going to prove this with rumors, but with texts published on their own official channels.
--
The first point I want to address is present in this small catechism of the new Mass (that's how they call the catechism of the Mass that I celebrate), published in La Porte Latine, which is an official site of the French district, yes? That's official. There it is affirmed in a summarized and programmatic way, that the new Mass, the one I celebrate for example, is not good, because it would be doubtfully valid. Do you understand? Doubtfully valid and certainly illicit. And the same text adds that the danger of the new Mass being invalid is very great. In other words, it is not just a doubt, a suspicion. That means that it is not just a matter of saying: I prefer to go to the traditional rite. No. Here they are teaching to look at the Ordinary Mass, the one we celebrate in the Latin Church, as a liturgical act objectively suspicious in its very validity. This is clear, this is very serious, very serious.
I show you on the screen the source [min 5:08] here is the PDF of this small catechism, it is in French, if you go to point number 11 here it is, those who know French will understand it. I have the translation here:
--
Here we are on the official website of La Porte Latine and the title is: “The New Mass is not good, because it is doubtful, invalid and certainly illicit”. Let's go to number 11 that I mentioned, here are several points where they explain why they came to this resolution. It says: "Is it the danger that the new Mass is invalid very great? Yes, the danger that the new Mass is invalid is very great. This is affirmed, among others, by Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, Archbishop Lefebvre and the renowned German liturgist K. Gamber. The reason has been explained in numbers 8 and 9."
--
Basically, [they say that] because [we Catholics] have no intention of celebrating as it has always been celebrated and not even the subjective intention, as explained here (nbr. 9), neither objective nor subjective, and therefore the possibility that our Mass is only a religious dramatization but not at all with the fruit of the Sacrament is very great.
--
It is important to say at this point that I do not want to address theological debates but simply want to say what they believe, so that people are clear about what they think and then deepen why they arrive at this very divisive thinking.
--
We continue. That same practical catechism goes even further. it says that it is never allowed to actively attend the new Mass. That merely passive assistance would only be tolerable in serious cases such as a wedding or funeral. That it would be not so much for the Mass itself but because the sacrament of marriage would be valid and because at a funeral it would be to accompany people. Since they doubt so much if there is a sacrament, they will surely refer to one accompanying the family or something similar. "[that catechism says]That the Sunday precept is not fulfilled in this way" That if you go to our Mass: "You are not fulfilling the Sunday precept." That is what they clearly think. That one should not actively attend even if one has access to a Traditional Mass. That is to say: that if there is a Mass celebrated in communion with Rome, in full communion... (when I say Traditional Mass you know what I mean, don't you?) That Mass is useless either. [imitating them:] "If you go to a Mass it must be ours, that of the Society of St. Pius X." That is important for them to be clear about, it is a totally rupturing, divisive thought, and that not even... let's see, I want to make something clear, I don't want to say that they have bad intentions or anything like that, uh... the laity or the priests, or the majority, or all of them, I don't know, because I can't see the hearts. What I mean is that the thought, the doctrine, the idea, the concept, what they teach, in itself is so. That they intend to do this... I know that the faithful, the laity surely pray for unity and all that. Priests surely also offer Mass for this surely. I'm not talking about his intentions. I am talking about what this thought produces. Make this distinction so that it is not said that I am condemning intentions or something similar. I'm talking about what they believe. Yes? And that not even (I continue with the above), one should not even go only to receive communion, nor receive consecrated hosts there. Why? Not even consecrated Hosts, because the logic is consistent: if there is a serious suspicion, substantiated, according to their vision, that our Masses are not valid. So, of course, there is also a great suspicion that the Eucharist is really the Eucharist, that is: that what we consecrate is really a Sacrament. Because most likely Jesus is not there, in the Tabernacle, Jesus is not there. Because that priest would probably have celebrated an invalid Mass and there would be nothing there but a little piece of bread.
--
The reason they give is forceful. For this text, the new Mass cannot even be considered a Catholic rite in the sense required for the Sunday precept, because it would imply an ambiguous profession of faith susceptible to Protestant reading. This is what this same catechism says. I present you again on the screen, number 37 [min. 10:05], it says: "Can the Sunday precept be satisfied with passive attendance at the new Mass?" That is to say that at least one is there and that's it, well... he no longer sings, I don't know…, he doesn't participate actively, only that he is there and he waits for everything to come together, just to say: "I have already attended Sunday Mass." Then it says [the Catechism of the Lefebvrists]: "No, the Sunday precept cannot be satisfied with passive attendance at the New Mass because this precept requires active attendance at Mass." So going to our Masses, is useless, as far as the Sunday precept is concerned.
--
Here it continues with the same thing [point 38 of the Catechism of the Lefebvrists]: "Can one at least actively attend the new Sunday Mass if one cannot attend the traditional Mass? No, you can never attend the new Mass, even if you can't attend the traditional Sunday Mass." Okay, then come the justifications, that I don't want to get into theological discussions now. I want you to know what they really believe.
--
[Point 39 of their catechism:] "Can you at least actively attend the new Mass if it is celebrated without abuse? No, one cannot at least actively attend the new Mass if it is celebrated without abuse, because its ambiguity at the level of faith does not depend on the abuses, but on the official rite of the Mass itself." That is to say, what is corrupt is not even he who celebrates, which moreover does not even have the intention or most likely does not have it, but it is the rite itself, the Mass itself is corrupt, basically. That is tremendous, tremendous.
--
[Item 40] Here is what they say:"Can you at least attend the new Mass even if it is only to receive communion? No, you can't at least attend the new Mass even if it's just to receive communion." Do you understand this? Do you understand this?
[Item 41] "Finally, is the new Mass good? No, the new Mass is not good because it is doubtful and certainly illicit.
Numeral 42: "Does it mean that all who celebrate or actively attend the new Mass commit mortal sin?" That is, [they analyse ] if you and I are in mortal sin. Basically, they say, "Most people who attend the new Mass are in a state of invincible ignorance, so they are not necessarily in moral sin because to do so they have to have full knowledge and full consent. Although the matter is serious, they do not have full knowledge of it and therefore it safeguards them and therefore they are not in mortal sin."
--
But that is very serious!, I think it is understood. Think about what this produces in the mind of a simple faithful. If it is repeated to him that the ordinary Mass of the Church can be invalid, that he should not participate in it, that he does not fulfill the precept there, right? And that he must not even receive communion there, then the psychological and spiritual conclusion is inevitable: the visible Church ceases to appear as a safe home of grace and the Sacraments. And when the whole Church becomes suspect, the only safe place becomes the group itself, the Society in this case. That in practice is not only conservatism, it is not only a desire to preserve tradition, it is a logic of schism. And that logic, sociologically and pastorally, unfortunately, it must be said, right? It is sectarian.
--
But it doesn't end only at the Nobus Ordo. In the Tradizione Católica [I don't know if I wrote it correctly] in the magazine of the Italian district of the fraternity, it is stated that when the Traditional Mass is celebrated under the framework of the mottu proprio... its gestures... That is to say: when a traditional Mass, accepted by the Catholic Church, if celebrated, what they call the Tridentine Mass, which is in communion with the Pope, a full communion, [the Lefebvians] say: "their gestures are emptied of all signified" and then adds that "every celebration officially presented, according to these terms, will be, in our judgment, he says, as unacceptable as the new Mass." That is, not only is the Novus Ordo rejected, but an important part of the Traditional Mass celebrated within the visible structure of the Church is also rejected. And the same article goes on to say the following: "the habitual (or worse: even exclusive) attendance at those granted Masses…" (the traditional ones, in communion with Pope Leo XIV, with the Church) they say: "constitutes a public and external profession of a certain conception of the Church, of doctrine, of the Council and of the Mass" a conception that the text qualifies as clearly suspected of heresy. That is, that participating in these traditional Masses within communion with the Roman pontiff is suspected of heresy.
--
Later, this same study applies by analogy to the new Mass and to the Traditional Mass celebrated with the permission of the Vatican, criteria taken from the Comunicatio Insacris [I don't know if I spelled it correctly], of communion in the sacred, with clergy is considered irregular. "Since they are in communion with this irregular clergy, what are they building up with this communion with this clergy is not that?" I, who am also part of the clergy... [they say about me:] "he is not really Catholic" according to his way of thinking about it, of seeing it.
--
Here we are no longer dealing with a ritual preference, we are dealing with a system of separation of practical religious life from the ordinary sacramental life of the Catholic Church.
--
[Now he shows you the cover of that Tradizione Catolica, anno 30, Nº 2 (110) 2019, at min 15:55] this is the document I was referring to, from 2019, just for example, I can't show you every text, it seems to me that it would be very long, however here is one of them, it says: "On the other hand, even if it were not so, the habitual, or even exclusive, attendance at Masses according to the letter or spirit of the Motu Proprio, this permission given by Pope Benedict to celebrate the Traditional Mass, for example, constitutes in itself a public and external profession of a certain conception of the Church, of doctrine, of the Council and of the Mass itself." That is to say, that anyone who celebrates the Traditional Mass, with the permission of the Vatican, is basically applying to that Mass a conception of the post-conciliar, of that Church... no longer the traditional Catholic of always. With which "a conception clearly suspected of heresy would be favored." Of heresy, yes? Whoever goes to the San Pedro Fraternity, for example, "suspected of heresy." Whoever goes to the Saint Vicente Ferrer Fraternity, which also celebrates the Traditional Mass, is suspected of heresy. Whoever goes to the Fraternity of the Benedictines, who celebrate the ancient rite... also suspected of heresies. This is very serious. And this line of thought is not a recent issue or occurrence.
--
In the report on the enumeration of the colloquium with the congregation for the doctrine of the faith, a historical text preserved on this same website: La Porte Latine, there is talk of the radical incompatibility between the Catholic Church and the Conciliar Church. The conciliar Church would be us and the Catholic Church would be preserved in the Society of St. Pius X. And in the same documentation Lefebvre is attributed with the thesis that the new rite of the Mass expresses a faith that is not ours. The faith of the Lefrebvrists of the Society of St. Pius X is not the same as ours. And that is why there is this current incompatibility of this dialogue that was proposed. "a faith that is not the faith of the Catholic Church" they say. In other words, they are telling me: "you are not really Catholic" this is very strong, and they are also saying it to you. And that supposes ANOTHER RELIGION. That is very serious.
--
This is very important. They do not simply say that there was abuse, misapplication or ambiguities in the application. The language used is that of an overall and essential religious alteration. We are another religion for them. That is why it gives me a tremendous helplessness when one of their members says to me, a priest: "Father." But how do you say to me, Father, …priest? Don't you know what you think? You think we are another religion! How are you going to say to someone of another religion "priest, Father, bless me"? or something similar.
[It's just that neither the "ordinary" Catholics nor most those Lefebvrians, I suppose, knew what they really are, so I thought they were simply people who wanted to remain in the Church according to the Council of Trent, but no.]
--
This view is unfortunately deeply sectarian. And that rhetoric was not buried in the 70's... ah, I don't know if you want me to show you the above, that is on the official pages: here we are at La Porte Latine again, official site of the fraternity in French: Report of the colloquium held at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on January 12, 1979 and here they immediately quote, 1st. Period, "in a preliminary note to a letter addressed to the Holy Father, they wrote:
"Let it be clear, this is not a dispute between Archbishop Lefebvrre and Pope Paul VI. It is a question of the radical incompatibility between the Catholic Church and the Conciliar Church, the Mass of Paul VI being the one that represents the program of the Conciliar Church."
--
[I write it again: The Council of Trent forbade, under pain of anathema, to change one iota of the Tridentine Mass. Then Paul VI would be excommunicated and so would the others. But Jesus Christ, in the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses, Mary Help of Mothers, settled the matter, only He could approve the modern Mass, and said that IT IS VALID. But since there are many abuses, He wants a return to the Traditional Mass. He can do that because He is Lord of Lords and King of Kings, and Head of the Church (the Pope is His Vicar).]
--
Continuing with the inform, they say, "The explanation of these words is here: "Good! The insistence of those who were sent from Rome to ask us to change our rite makes us reflect. And we are convinced that this new rite of the Mass (1) expresses a new faith, a faith that is not ours, a faith that is not Catholic. This new Mass is a symbol, an expression, an image of a new faith, a modernist faith... Now, it is evident that this new rite is sustained, if I may say so, it presupposes another conception of the Catholic faith (2), another religion... Gradually, the Protestant notion of the Mass is being introduced into the Holy Church.
(1) That we celebrate.
(2) They do say that, that is known.
They say this clearly. And brothers, this conception did not remain, then, only in the 70s. In 2020, the current superior general, now better known as Father Pagliarani, in a letter published by La Porte Latine, this official site, affirms that "the combat of fraternity is the combat of faith and doctrine, tragically threatened even in Rome itself by the galloping apostasy of our century."
[If they don't believe in the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses, they don't know where God is]
And shortly afterwards he quotes the founder with another brutal, tremendous phrase:
"This new religion is not the Catholic religion," he confirms!
That is to say, we are not only talking about crisis, confusion or decadence, which I also see, you can see my videos on YouTube that I often talk about how badly in many places the Holy Doctrine or the liturgy is handled. They speak of a new religion, of an apostasy that would reach even Rome.
--
[Our Lady of the Roses said that Satan will rule the Church for a short time, but that WE MUST NEVER LEAVE BECAUSE A ROMAN CATHOLIC MUST DIE A ROMAN CATHOLIC TO ENTER HEAVEN. We must ask the Holy Spirit for Light to avoid false obedience. And those who reject the Messages of Our Lady of Roses will be rejected by Heaven. We love the Church and we must stay fighting the good fight. The Messages will be approved in the future.
--
The Church always had problems. She always had to fight external and internal enemies, there was the schism of the East; in the time of St. Francis the Church was about to tilt and fall, but he sustained it; St. Bridget of Sweden denounces grave sins; then came the Protestant heretics, Anglicans, etc., but now, that Catholics not believe in the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses... and that they continue to receive Communion in the hand, it is terrible, by not using the Sacramentals they are not protected and the children of Satan infiltrated are making us disappear physically, since most of those who go to Mass are haters of Catholics and do not believe that Jesus is in the Eucharist (of course, if there are so many clone priests, false...), but we believe in the words of Jesus Christ about the one CHURCH: the gates of hell will not prevail against her.]
--
Here I show you again another article from this same portal: the letter of the Superior General on the occasion of the 50th anniversary... and we are going to go directly to where he quotes Archbishop Lefebvre. “Our founder observed this with dismay: ‘They no longer transmit Our Lord Jesus Christ at all, but a sentimental, superficial and charismatic religiosity [...] This new religion is not Catholic; it is sterile, incapable of sanctifying society and the family."
--
[Read the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses and you will see how She guides you on the path of personal sanctification, and Church and society too!, moreover, if we obeyed them, the imminent Chastisement that God the Father is going to send would not come upon us. People do not even obey them to be protected in those days of tremendous suffering that are to come, since God punishes all sin.]
--
And with regard to the first point, which is "Should fraternity be militant?" they say: "The struggle for the faith, the struggle to defend doctrine tragically threatened even in Rome itself by the rampant apostasy of our century." Quote: "even threatened in Rome itself..." And the same, brothers, appears in other texts hosted on their channels. For example, Monsignor Bernard Tissier says that the parallel Church is the new church of Vatican II, with its new religion, or rather: non-religion.
--
In another text also hosted by the Porte Latine, it is stated that the conciliar church, formally considered, is a sect that occupies the Catholic Church and adds that this conciliar church would have its new priesthood and its new cult. There is no need to exaggerate anything. Words are strong enough on their own. When a group describes the post-onciliary Catholic reality in this way, it is presenting the visible Church not as a wounded Mother, but as a practically alien structure, apostate, I insist, as a new religion.
I insist, here is the interview with Monsignor Bernard Tissier de Mallerais at the Angelus of July 31, 2008, and we are going to look for the part where he talks about religion, where he says that it is not even a religion:
When asked: "What would you say to those who predicted in 1988 that the Society of St. Pius X was creating a parallel church? Hasn't history proved them wrong?
[24:23] Everywhere there is a mixture full of compromises because of liberalism and weakness of spirit. The parallel church [that is, us] is the new church of Vatican II: its spirit, it’s a new religion or it’s a non-religion.”
Is this understood? So may they treat us according to what they really believe. That is, treat us as they think. May they not falsify what they think. Because then, if they don't speak clearly as they think, people don't know where they're messing or who they're messing with. That is, with people who have this conception of us. Because many go there simply saying: "because the Mass is beautiful. There they tell me that there is really the tradition of the Church... well… I want to go there."
--
But they do not really realize the conception they have of the Catholic Church. On the other hand, Father Jen Michelle, in 2024, expressly takes up that line. That is also on the official website, he affirms that according to this logic there are also doubts according to the confirmation and last rites that we give. That there is also doubt about the Eucharist.
--
And as for the Sacrament of Holy Orders, he says that the question is analogous to that of the Mass and that validity could only be judged on a case-by-case basis in concrete celebrations. I received priestly ordination in Spanish, with a Nobus Ordo Mass, then they would say of me: "this is... uff, almost 100%, most likely that he does not have a priesthood”. That is as far as the scope of this conception goes. Is this understood, brothers? Notice what it means for the conscience of a believer. He can no longer trust with Catholic simplicity in the sacramental life of the Church because everything remains under structural suspicion. It is true that [according to their (lack of) vision] not every priesthood or every post-conciliar episcopate is always invalidated, but it does create such a broad doubt that in practice it destroys the normal confidence in the sacramentality of the visible Church. Do you understand? In other words, the only ones who have a valid Mass and who practically have the sacraments would only accept [our] baptism, marriage, confession (probably)... I don't know how far those reaches of conception can go, as far as I know... But the other sacraments... But if I am not a priest, how am I going to confess? In other words: the confession is also discarded.
--
In other words, there is a very serious doubt regarding my sacramental confession, [regarding] what I can do as a priest properly. That's why he puts it there in this way. I can also give you the article so you can see it, here it is, wow... [from La Porte Latine, published on April 11, 2024, "father" Jean Michele Gleize] Title: Schismatics and Heretics. Let's get to this specific point... and it says in number 10: "we know that there are doubts about the validity of the Sacraments of Extreme Unction and Confirmation, due to the matter in question." There is also doubt about the Sacrament of the Eucharist, the Mass, because of the ambiguity of the new rite that can distort the intention of the celebrant. As for the Sacrament of Holy Orders, the question, if any, is analogous to that of the Mass, its validity can only be judged on a case-by-case basis depending on the specific celebrations.
--
Dear brothers, when a group teaches that the new Mass is unlawful, flatly; and doubtfully valid, gravely doubtful, that the Traditional Mass officially celebrated, [and] that Traditional Mass celebrated in communion with Rome, can also be unacceptable, that doctrine is threatened even in Rome by apostasy, that there is a new religion and that the conciliar Church is a sect that occupies the Church, and that the sacraments of the conciliar bishops are doubtful or must be examined on a case-by-case basis, of the priests as well, then that group is no longer functioning as a simple liturgical or doctrinal current that wants to preserve tradition. It is functioning as an alternative system of religious security in front of the visible church. And this is exactly what many faithful do not perceive when they approach thinking that they are only going to a Mass with great reverence. Many faithful who attend the fraternity, in my experience, have never read these texts and perhaps would be scandalized if they saw them together. If they would understood them clearly. That is precisely why they must be shown. Not to insult anyone, not to insult people of good faith, but to make it clear that we are not dealing here with a simple love for the Traditional Mass. We are facing a way of thinking in which the traditional Catholic Church appears as an ambiguous, contaminated, corrupt, suspicious, practically apostate structure, almost replaced by another reality. And when a group presents itself as the only safe refuge from the whole of the ordinary life of the Church, that group is acting with sectarian logic, even if it uses traditional language and solemn vestments.
--
[I once went to confession there, thinking that it was a fraternity of Catholic priests, then I learned about them and that, in that time confession was valid with them and the Mass was illicit but valid. And I didn't want to return anymore. I had told the confessor: ".... And talking to a priest after Mass, he made me see that this sin was grave..." and the individual was more interested in finding out who that priest was than in the confession itself. Obviously the Church is full of infiltrators who come to destroy from within and that fraternity is no exception. And I heard there, as I left, for the first time, part of a Latin Mass and it was a horror, I said to myself that this could not be the Mass that people loved so much and the reason why half of the faithful in the USA had stayed in the Catholic Church. Shortly thereafter I heard a Mass for the first time at Star of the Sea Church, in Latin-Spanish by Father Olivera Ravasi and... I entered another dimension... It was super strong. Beautiful. In the Catholic Church Jesus Christ is and always will be, and "he who seeks, finds" as Jesus said. Even if it gets difficult in these times and getting worse and worse.
--
In addition, those people sound to me like the first heretics that the Church banished, where some were very puritanical in their doctrines and in practice they were pigs.
In this video, at min. 24:23, we read something in La Porte Latine, which Father Byron did not point out but that says: "I answer you: where is the Church, dear ones? Recognize the tree by its fruit, where the fruit is, there is the Church. I do not mean that the Church is reduced to the Society, but that its heart is in the Society", and I would answer him: where are the fruits of the priestly fraternity of St. Pius X? because we have post-conciliar saints who are very faithful to the Church, the best known: Saint Teresa of Calcutta... those of the fraternity neither have saints nor apparitions nor miracles nor prophecies, as the Catholic Church has... neither do the Orthodox, the Protestant heretics, the Anglicans and all the other bits into which that dead heretical branch was broken, not to mention the infidels (Jews and Muslims) all of them, ALL of them, believe themselves superior to the Catholic Church and have nothing but a dead faith. And on top of that, Jesus Christ loved His own "to the end" (Jn), those of the Society want to hijack the Heart of Jesus, who loves the Church even when she has been marked by disasters since the year 900, when the Holy Spirit began to be invoked directly... Jesus Christ never abandoned and will never leave the Church, even if she is ruled by Satan for a short time. But those of the fraternity claim to be the heart of the Church!! Fringe group of fruitless blind people that if they were given an amnesty now (I publish this on July 15, 2026), they will only be a germ of schism in the Church. I see it in Spanish politics, they are an obvious sample. Socialism (satanism, communism) only dictates laws of death and brings Spain to the brink of bankruptcy, when the center-right rises they have to clean up the broken dishes of those individuals but they do not have the courage to legislate for life, now those center-right have a leader sold to the planners of a single world, an individual of the worst who for years has been legislating against the health of people and nature. But there is a right-wing party, with pretensions of being the most pro-life, which have an internal dictatorship and every time they manage to govern a community (making a pact with the center-right) they always get upset with the first difficulty and break the pact, they always spend their time breaking the pacts that brought them to power. And the worst thing is that they hate true pro-lifers. They think they are the superior Puritans, and they are the worst. I think the same of the Lefebvrists.]
--
My final invitation is very simple: if you are frequenting those environments, first read their own texts, read them in their entirety, compare what is taught there with what the Church teaches [first the Catholic priests should teach us well what the Church teaches, but most of them are infiltrated rats who teach heresies, the situation is terrible. But we must always stay in the Church which is the one Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, and He governs her with justice and mercy] Ask yourself honestly if they are helping you to love the Catholic Church more [You will achieve that only if you listen and obey the Messages of Our Lady of the Roses, which command us to read, among other things, the Founding Fathers], or if they are training you to distrust her. Because true tradition never consists in building a small refuge away from the Church. It consists of living the Catholic faith within the Church, with the Church, and in communion with the Church.
The Lord be with you. The blessing of Almighty God, through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, St. Joseph and all the Angels and Saints. In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.